BMW F 900 R 2020 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 900 R 2020 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

When comparing the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine and drive train, both bikes have an inline engine type and liquid cooling. However, there are some differences in power and torque. The BMW F 900 R has a 105 HP engine with 92 Nm of torque, while the Triumph Speed Triple R boasts a more powerful 135 HP engine with 111 Nm of torque. Additionally, the BMW F 900 R has 2 cylinders and a displacement of 895 ccm, whereas the Triumph Speed Triple R has 3 cylinders and a displacement of 1050 ccm.

When it comes to suspension, the BMW F 900 R features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and offers adjustment options for preload and rebound at the rear. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple R has a telescopic fork at the front and provides adjustment options for compression, preload, and rebound at the rear.

In terms of chassis, the BMW F 900 R has a steel frame with a twin tube design that acts as a load-bearing engine. The Triumph Speed Triple R, on the other hand, has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design.

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons, but the Triumph Speed Triple R has the additional feature of radial monoblock technology, which enhances its braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 900 R has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, both with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1518 mm, a seat height of 815 mm, and a kerb weight (with ABS) of 211 kg. The fuel tank capacity is relatively small at 13 liters. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple R has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, also with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1435 mm, a seat height of 825 mm, and a kerb weight (with ABS) of 212 kg. The fuel tank capacity is larger at 17.5 liters.

Now, let's consider the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The BMW F 900 R 2020 is praised for its easy handling and high stability. Its chassis offers a fine response, and the engine is well-behaved. The brakes are also reliable, and the seating position is active yet comfortable. Additionally, the BMW F 900 R has an extensive list of accessories available.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 is known for its flawless racing chassis, which provides precise and relatively stable handling. It also has an attractive design and a great engine. The brakes are stable and reliable.

However, the BMW F 900 R does have some weaknesses. Its small fuel tank capacity of 13 liters may be limiting for longer rides. Additionally, while the engine is generally good, it may not have the same power and performance as the Triumph Speed Triple R.

In contrast, the Triumph Speed Triple R has some weaknesses as well. It requires wider radii when turning, which may be less maneuverable in certain situations. It may also be somewhat complicated to ride in turns. Additionally, there may be some weaknesses in terms of comfort.

In conclusion, the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW F 900 R offers easy handling, high stability, and a well-behaved engine, while the Triumph Speed Triple R boasts a flawless racing chassis, great engine, and stable brakes. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW F 900 R 2020 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

BMW F 900 R 2020
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

Type de moteurType de moteurEn ligneType de moteurEn ligne
AlésageAlésage86 mmAlésage79 mm
CourseCourse77 mmCourse71.4 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur105 chPuissance du moteur135 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.8,500 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.9,400 tr/min
CoupleCouple92 NmCouple111 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple6,500 tr/minTr/min au couple7,750 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression13.1 Taux de compression12
Type d’embrayageType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huileType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huile
TransmissionTransmissionChaîneTransmissionChaîne
Nombre de vitessesNombre de vitesses6Nombre de vitesses6
CylindresCylindres2Cylindres3
Soupapes par cylindreSoupapes par cylindre4Soupapes par cylindre4
SoupapesSoupapesDOHCSoupapesDOHC
RefroidissementRefroidissementliquideRefroidissementliquide
CylindréeCylindrée895 cm³Cylindrée1,050 cm³

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopique inverséeSuspension avantFourche télescopique

Suspension arrière

AjustementAjustementPrécharge, DétenteAjustementCompression, Précharge, Détente

Châssis

CadreCadreAcierCadreAluminium
Type de cadreType de cadreTube double, moteur porteurType de cadreTube double

Freins avant

TypeTypeDouble disqueTypeDouble disque
PistonPistonQuatre pistonsPistonQuatre pistons
TechnologieTechnologieradialTechnologieradial, Monobloc

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonPiston uniquePistonDouble piston
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottant

Dimensions et poids

Largeur du pneu avantLargeur du pneu avant120 mmLargeur du pneu avant120 mm
Hauteur du pneu avantHauteur du pneu avant70 %Hauteur du pneu avant70 %
Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Largeur du pneu arrièreLargeur du pneu arrière180 mmLargeur du pneu arrière190 mm
Hauteur du pneu arrièreHauteur du pneu arrière55 %Hauteur du pneu arrière55 %
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
LongueurLongueur2,140 mmLongueur2,100 mm
LargeurLargeur815 mmLargeur795 mm
EmpattementEmpattement1,518 mmEmpattement1,435 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle815 mmHauteur de selle825 mm
Poids en ordre de marche (avec ABS)Poids en ordre de marche (avec ABS)211 kgPoids en ordre de marche (avec ABS)212 kg
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant13 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant17.5 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

La BMW F 900 R offre un plaisir facile à prendre en virage, une énorme stabilité, une position de conduite active mais confortable et un moteur sans friction mais aussi sans émotion. Si vous aimez la vitesse et les virages, vous serez heureux avec elle. Les possibilités de configuration sont infinies mais ne sont pas gratuites.

Manipulation facile, stabilité élevée

châssis avec réactivité fine

bon moteur

freins sans reproche

position de conduite active et néanmoins supportable

liste d'accessoires infinie

petit réservoir (13l)

bon moteur

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

La R se comporte avec plus de précision et de calme que jamais. Elle est garantie de garder son sang-froid même lorsque son pilote l'a peut-être déjà jetée au loin. L'inconvénient de ce concentré de puissance compact est que les rayons doivent être un peu plus larges et le parcours un peu plus rapide pour que la véritable reine d'Angleterre puisse jouer de ses 4 as dans la manche.

Châssis racing impeccable

très précis

relativement stable

look enthousiasmant

superbe moteur

freins stables

Nécessite de larges rayons

Un peu compliqué à conduire dans les virages

Faiblesses au niveau du confort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 900 R vs Triumph Speed Triple R

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 900 R 2020 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 14. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple R with 78 days compared to 82 days for the BMW F 900 R. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the BMW F 900 R was published on 11/5/2019 and now has more than 154,700 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH