Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

The Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 are both popular naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience.

In terms of engine power, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 has 97 HP, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 has a slightly higher power output of 106 HP. This gives the Triumph an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed.

The Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 is equipped with a 4-cylinder engine, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 has a 3-cylinder engine. The difference in cylinder configuration can result in variations in power delivery and engine characteristics.

Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperature during long rides. This is important for preventing overheating and ensuring consistent performance.

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

In terms of displacement, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 has a smaller engine size of 599cc, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 has a larger engine size of 675cc. The larger displacement of the Triumph gives it an advantage in terms of torque and overall performance.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1420mm compared to the 1410mm wheelbase of the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014. The seat height of the Honda is also slightly lower at 790mm, while the Triumph has a seat height of 800mm.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 has a larger tank with a capacity of 18 liters, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 has a slightly smaller tank with a capacity of 17.4 liters.

The Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 has several strengths, including an upside-down fork, a sportier engine with increased power, and a fun-to-ride nature. It also has a reliable chassis, comfortable seating position, and a good braking system. Additionally, there are plenty of accessories available for customization.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 is praised for its extremely easy handling, rev-happy engine, and wonderful three-cylinder sound. It also has powerful brakes and a cool streetfighter look.

However, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 does have some weaknesses, including a lack of wind protection and slightly poor torque at lower RPMs.

Similarly, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 has a few weaknesses, such as a hard chassis that may compromise comfort, a relatively weak engine at low RPMs, and the potential for increased noise over time. The brakes on the Triumph may also be less suitable for beginners.

In conclusion, both the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 offer unique strengths and weaknesses. The Honda provides a sportier engine and a reliable ride, while the Triumph offers easy handling and a distinctive sound. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Caractéristiques techniques Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 par rapport à Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur97 chPuissance du moteur106 ch
TransmissionTransmissionChaîneTransmissionChaîne
CylindresCylindres4Cylindres3
RefroidissementRefroidissementliquideRefroidissementliquide
CylindréeCylindrée599 cm³Cylindrée675 cm³

Dimensions et poids

EmpattementEmpattement1,420 mmEmpattement1,410 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle790 mmHauteur de selle800 mm
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant18 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant17.4 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

En termes de rapport qualité-prix, la Hornet se place cette année en tête des autres marques. Pour peu d'argent, on obtient près de 100 CV, un design cool, une roue agile et la garantie de nombreuses belles excursions à moto.

Fourche inversée

design plus frais

moteur sportif

puissance accrue

plaisir de conduire

châssis

position de conduite

système de freinage

poids réduit

très fiable

nombreux accessoires disponibles

Manque de protection contre le vent

couple de la cave un peu faible

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

La Street Triple R plaira à tous les motards et motardes. Construite par des passionnés, elle transmet le pur plaisir de conduire une moto sans en faire trop.

Extrêmement souple

moteur poussif

magnifique sonorité de trois cylindres

freins brutaux

look cool de streetfighter.

Châssis dur avec un confort modeste

moteur un peu faible en bas

assez bruyant à la longue

freinage pas forcément adapté aux débutants.

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Honda CB 600 F Hornet vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. With 60 days it takes the same amount of time to sell a Honda CB 600 F Hornet or a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 15 reviews for the Honda CB 600 F Hornet and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Honda CB 600 F Hornet was published on 2/16/2005 and now has more than 16,800 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.

Prix Honda CB 600 F Hornet

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives