Suzuki GSR 750 2016 vs. BMW F 900 R 2025

Suzuki GSR 750 2016

Suzuki GSR 750 2016

BMW F 900 R 2025

BMW F 900 R 2025

Loading...

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSR 750 2016 compared to BMW F 900 R 2025

Suzuki GSR 750 2016
BMW F 900 R 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore72 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke46 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,200 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque80 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.3 Compression Ratio13.1
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
Can be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceYesCan be restricted for A2 licenceYes
DisplacementDisplacement749 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth785 mmWidth870 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,514 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height760 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSR 750 2016

Suzuki GSR 750 2016

A razor-sharp design with an aggressive front and narrow rear - just as speedy street raiders have always wanted. It is a pity that the rear swingarm was neglected (officially for weight reasons, unofficially for cost reasons), and the front dual-piston brake system seems a little weak. However, the performance during the ride, both at high speed and in tight corners, is quite good.

Attractive overall appearance

stable handling

successful tuning of the suspension elements

sufficient comfort

easy-to-read instruments.

Brake system requires a lot of manual force

box swingarm not particularly pretty

BMW F 900 R 2025

BMW F 900 R 2025

The BMW F 900 R remains a prime example of common sense on two wheels in 2025. It does not impress with radical looks or a brute engine - but that is precisely its strength. If you are looking for a reliable, versatile naked bike suitable for everyday use that offers solid technology, modern safety features and a fair price-performance ratio, this is the bike for you. The model upgrade brings sensible improvements to details without overloading the tried and tested concept.

Price-performance ratio

Riding modes incl. Dynamic mode as standard

New, adjustable fork

ABS Pro and DTC as standard

Revised ergonomics: sporty but comfortable

Pleasant handling, accessible riding dynamics

Good workmanship, solid technology

Design still rather restrained, not very emotional

Quickshifter is stiff at low revs

Suspension set-up at the rear more geared towards comfort than sport

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSR 750 vs BMW F 900 R

Price Suzuki GSR 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons