Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025 vs. Yamaha SCR950 2017

Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025

Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025

Yamaha SCR950 2017

Yamaha SCR950 2017

Loading...

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025 compared to Yamaha SCR950 2017

Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025
Yamaha SCR950 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn line crankpin offsetEngine typeV
BoreBore78 mmBore85 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke83 mm
Engine powerEngine power47 HPEngine power52 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power5,500 rpm
TorqueTorque52.3 NmTorque79.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,650 rpmRpm at Torque3,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio9
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionBelt
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears5
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesOHCValvesOHC
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement648 ccmDisplacement942 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel135 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberDual Shock
TravelTravel90 mmTravel110 mm
MaterialMaterialSteelMaterialSteel

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter298 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,318 mmLength2,255 mm
WidthWidth892 mmWidth895 mm
HeightHeight1,137 mmHeight1,170 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,575 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)243 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)252 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14.8 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025

Royal Enfield Classic 650 2025

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha SCR950 2017

Yamaha SCR950 2017

The new SCR950 further expands the wide range of "Faster Sons" retro bikes. A visually extremely successful, minimalist bike with beautiful scrambler elements. When riding on asphalt, you only notice that the XV950 cruiser serves as the basis because of the low lean angle. The engine, on the other hand, pulls well and the brakes, each with a 298 disc at the front and rear, make a good effort. Off-road, however, the suspension elements quickly snap due to the high weight of 252 kilos. All in all, an interesting and very finely executed interpretation of a very early scrambler.

Credible scrambler look

comfortable seating position

powerful engine

adequately dimensioned brakes

uncomplicated handling

Apart from ABS, no electronic features

chassis fails quite quickly

comparatively little lean angle clearance

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Classic 650 vs Yamaha SCR950

Price Royal Enfield Classic 650

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha SCR950

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons