Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009
Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke61.2 mmStroke55 mm
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight138 kgDry Weight107 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.7 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

On the typical motorbike routes, you become a moving obstacle on long uphill stretches. If you don't have anything to prove to anyone, you'll reach your destination a little later; the rest of us should go for more engine capacity.

Pleasant driving experience

really good off-road characteristics

quite stable and precise.

Climbing obstacles without momentum is not possible.

Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH