Kawasaki KLX 250 2016 vs. Husaberg FE 350 2013

Kawasaki KLX 250 2016

Kawasaki KLX 250 2016

Husaberg FE 350 2013

Husaberg FE 350 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki KLX 250 2016 compared to Husaberg FE 350 2013

Kawasaki KLX 250 2016
Husaberg FE 350 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke61.2 mmStroke57.5 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement349.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeDouble cradle, Perimeter

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,430 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height970 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.7 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki KLX 250 2016

Kawasaki KLX 250 2016

On the typical motorbike routes, you become a moving obstacle on long uphill stretches. If you don't have anything to prove to anyone, you'll reach your destination a little later; the rest of us should go for more engine capacity.

Pleasant driving experience

really good off-road characteristics

quite stable and precise.

Climbing obstacles without momentum is not possible.

Husaberg FE 350 2013

Husaberg FE 350 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons