Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 vs. Honda NC750X 2016

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

Honda NC750X 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 vs Honda NC750X 2016

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and the Honda NC750X 2016 are both enduro motorcycles, but they have some distinct differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine and drive train, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 has a bore of 84 mm and a stroke of 81.5 mm, while the Honda NC750X 2016 has a bore of 77 mm and a stroke of 80 mm. The Himalayan has a single-cylinder engine with 40 HP of power and 40 Nm of torque, while the NC750X has a twin-cylinder engine with 55 HP of power and 68 Nm of torque. Both bikes have an electric starter and chain transmission.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature a monoshock rear shock absorber. In terms of chassis, the Himalayan has a steel twin-spar frame, while the NC750X has a steel twin-tube, tubular frame.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Himalayan has a front tire diameter of 21 inches, a rear tire width of 140 mm, and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The NC750X has a front tire diameter of 17 inches and a rear tire width of 160 mm. The Himalayan has a wheelbase of 1510 mm, while the NC750X has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1540 mm. The seat height of the Himalayan is 825 mm, while the NC750X has a slightly higher seat height of 830 mm. The Himalayan also has a lower kerb weight of 196 kg compared to the NC750X's 219 kg. Both bikes have ABS and the Himalayan has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters compared to the NC750X's 14.1 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 is praised for its cleanly responsive, low-vibration engine, superbly tuned chassis, good brakes, and modern navigation thanks to TripperDash. It also offers exceptionally good ergonomics when standing and sitting, a fairly high payload, ample standard equipment, and a very long range.

On the other hand, the Honda NC750X 2016 is considered very manageable and affordable, with low fuel consumption. It also features a DCT dual-clutch transmission, adjustable driving modes, and good brakes.

Honda NC750X 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

However, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 does have some weaknesses. The workmanship could be better, the navigation drains smartphone battery, and the wind protection could be improved.

Similarly, the Honda NC750X 2016 has its weaknesses, including a weak engine and an early onset of the rev limiter.

In conclusion, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and the Honda NC750X 2016 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Himalayan offers a responsive engine, excellent chassis, and good ergonomics, while the NC750X is known for its manageability, affordability, and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 compared to Honda NC750X 2016

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024
Honda NC750X 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke86 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power24 HPEngine power55 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpm
TorqueTorque32 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,250 rpmRpm at Torque4,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio10.7
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeDual-clutch
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder2Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesOHVValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement411 ccmDisplacement745 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,190 mmLength2,210 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,370 mmHeight1,285 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,540 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)219 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity14.1 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

The new Royal Enfield Himalayan is a great evolution of the original concept. It is still not about performance or sportiness, but about accessibility and adventure suitability. Royal Enfield has made significant improvements in the most important areas, such as the brakes and suspension, 40 Horsepower makes it more fun and practical than ever and even includes unexpected features such as the TripperDash with 3D Google Maps navigation. If you can distance yourself from the performance mania of western touring enduros, you will find the Himalayan a nimble, accessible and fun bike for adventures big and small.

Cleanly responsive engine with enough power for motorway stages and riding pleasure

Very well tuned suspension

Good brakes at last

Modern navigation thanks to TripperDash

Exceptionally successful ergonomics when standing and sitting

Fairly high payload

Good features for the price

Very long range

Unrivalled value for money

Navigation drains smartphone battery

Wind protection with standard windscreen rather limited

Honda NC750X 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

With its DCT (Dual Clutch Transmission), the NC750X is the most coherent model in the NC range. With its windshield, long suspension travel and the resulting increase in comfort, it is also suitable for longer distances and even travelling. After all, why shouldn't beginners also be able to enjoy comfortable yet uncomplicated travel? Above all, the comparatively low centre of gravity takes away the fear of the visually much larger and more bulky NC750X, even for inexperienced riders. The engine is not too sporty, but the DCT, which changes gears extremely precisely and easily at the touch of a button or even fully automatically, quickly makes you forget that. The helmet compartment under the dummy tank is particularly ingenious.

very manageable

affordable

low fuel consumption

surprises no one

DCT dual-clutch transmission

adjustable driving modes

good brakes

weak engine

early onset of rev limiter

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Honda NC750X

There are a few key differences between a Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and a Honda NC750X 2016. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Royal Enfield Himalayan and 23 reviews for the Honda NC750X since model year 2014. The first review for the Royal Enfield Himalayan was published on 5/7/2018 and now has more than 77,300 views. This compares to more than 8,800 views for the first review on Honda NC750X published on 11/3/2013.

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda NC750X

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH