Aprilia Shiver 750 2010 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2009

Aprilia Shiver 750 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Overview - Aprilia Shiver 750 2010 vs KTM 690 Duke 2009

Aprilia Shiver 750 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

50 Years Strong: One Brand – One Promise!

Perfect fit, premium quality – with Hepco&Becker accessories, your bike is ready for any adventure. Quality made in Germany.

Details

Technical Specifications Aprilia Shiver 750 2010 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2009

Aprilia Shiver 750 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Aprilia Shiver 750 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	92 mm	Bore	102 mm
Engine power	Engine power	95 HP	Engine power	65 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	9,000 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	7,500 rpm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Cylinders	Cylinders	2	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	750 ccm	Displacement	654 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Four pistons
Technology	Technology	radial	Technology	radial

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Piston	Piston	Single piston	Piston	Single piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,440 mm	Wheelbase	1,472 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	800 mm	Seat Height	865 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	15 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	13.5 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Aprilia Shiver 750 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.