Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 vs. Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 vs Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Technical Specifications Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 compared to Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009
Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke61.2 mmStroke52 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11 Compression Ratio10
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height890 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight138 kgDry Weight102 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.7 lFuel Tank Capacity5.7 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

On the typical motorbike routes, you become a moving obstacle on long uphill stretches. If you don't have anything to prove to anyone, you'll reach your destination a little later; the rest of us should go for more engine capacity.

Pleasant driving experience

really good off-road characteristics

quite stable and precise.

Climbing obstacles without momentum is not possible.

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH