Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 vs. Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Loading...

Overview - Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 vs Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Technical Specifications Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 compared to Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore81 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke61.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power172 HPEngine power95.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpm
TorqueTorque129 NmTorque87 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,750 rpmRpm at Torque7,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.27
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,237 ccmDisplacement888 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonSix pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
WidthWidth755 mmWidth935 mm
HeightHeight1,220 mmHeight1,452 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,545 mmWheelbase1,551 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height850 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.5 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Like the other Honda models in the test, the VFR is also convincing on the brakes and has no weaknesses when it comes to safety. It's just a shame that you have to refuel every 300 kilometres.

Mechanical dual-clutch transmission

incomparable acceleration feel

sporty driving style

sophisticated technology.

Extremely high consumption of urine.

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

It's impressive how well the bike manages the balancing act between on- and off-road, doing exactly what a touring enduro should be able to do, or what you still want to do with a touring enduro. And it does so with a degree of maturity that is astonishing for a new model and shows that Triumph has done its homework and has sensibly further developed the already underrated Tiger 800. Even if some die-hard Tiger fans may miss the now less pronounced, typical whistle of the three-cylinder. The question of whether the Tiger 900 Rally Pro is ready for the road can only be answered with a "when do you want to go again?

Three-cylinder engine full of character

significantly improved off-road capability

comfortable suspension elements

quickshifter with blipper as standard

generous standard equipment, even heated seats for rider and passenger

good ergonomics

good wind and weather protection

long-distance capability.

Handguards not very robust for off-road use

flood of switches on left handlebars

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda VFR 1200 F vs Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro

Price Honda VFR 1200 F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons