Yamaha WR 125 X 2016 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Overview - Yamaha WR 125 X 2016 vs KTM 690 Duke 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

50 Years Strong: One Brand – One Promise!

Perfect fit, premium quality – with Hepco&Becker accessories, your bike is ready for any adventure. Quality made in Germany.

Details

Technical Specifications Yamaha WR 125 X 2016 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	52 mm	Bore	102 mm
Engine power	Engine power	15 HP	Engine power	65 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	9,000 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	7,500 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.2	Compression Ratio	11.8
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	124.7 ccm	Displacement	654 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Chromium-molybdenum
Frame type	Frame type	Double cradle	Frame type	Tubular

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,430 mm	Wheelbase	1,472 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	875 mm	Seat Height	865 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	13.5 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A1	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.