Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and suspension setups. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Speed Triple 1050 has a clear advantage with 132 HP compared to the Street Triple 675 R's 106 HP. The Speed Triple also has higher torque at 110 Nm compared to the Street Triple's 68 Nm. This means that the Speed Triple will have more raw power and acceleration, making it a better choice for riders who crave speed and performance.

Both bikes have three cylinders and liquid cooling systems, ensuring efficient engine operation and preventing overheating. The Street Triple has a displacement of 675cc, while the Speed Triple has a larger displacement of 1050cc. This means that the Speed Triple's engine will have more overall power and torque due to its larger size.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front, but the Street Triple uses Kayaba suspension while the Speed Triple uses Showa suspension. Both brands are reputable and known for their quality, so the choice between them may come down to personal preference.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Both bikes have twin tube frame types, providing stability and control during rides. The brakes on both models feature four pistons and radial technology, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Street Triple has a slightly smaller wheelbase of 1410mm compared to the Speed Triple's 1437mm. The seat height of the Street Triple is 800mm, while the Speed Triple has a slightly higher seat height of 828mm. The Street Triple is also lighter, with a kerb weight of 183kg compared to the Speed Triple's 219kg. Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the Street Triple holding 17.4 liters and the Speed Triple holding 17.5 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Street Triple is praised for being extremely easy to handle, with a rev-happy engine that produces a wonderful three-cylinder sound. Its brakes are also described as "brute," providing strong stopping power. Additionally, the Street Triple has a cool streetfighter look, adding to its appeal.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

On the other hand, the Speed Triple is praised for its controlled chassis and hard sound. It is also described as stable, making it a good choice for riders who prioritize stability and control.

In terms of weaknesses, the Street Triple's chassis is described as hard, which may result in modest comfort during longer rides. The engine is also said to be a little weak at the bottom, meaning it may lack power at lower RPMs. Additionally, the Street Triple can become quite loud over time, which may be a drawback for some riders. The brakes are also noted as not being entirely suitable for beginners, potentially requiring more skill to handle effectively.

The Speed Triple's only weakness mentioned is its rough gearing, which can sometimes disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine.

In summary, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both powerful naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Street Triple offers easy handling, a rev-happy engine, and a cool streetfighter look, while the Speed Triple provides a controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore74 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power132 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque110 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandKayabaBrandShowa
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandShowa
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,086 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth728 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,437 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height828 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight183 kgKerb Weight219 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Every motorcyclist will love the Street Triple R. It was built by enthusiasts. It was built by enthusiasts and conveys the pure pleasure of riding a motorbike without being too demanding.

Extremely easy to handle

rev-happy engine

wonderful three-cylinder sound

brute brakes

cool streetfighter look.

Hard chassis with modest comfort

engine a little weak at the bottom

quite loud over time

brakes not entirely suitable for beginners.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 60 days compared to 77 days for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 7/20/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH