Yamaha XSR900 2020 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2020 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

Yamaha XSR900 2020
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight214 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2020

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic case of optical illusion – with its round headlight, angular fuel tank and mounted rear light, it clearly comes across as a retro bike. However, it’s no coincidence that its performance is reminiscent of the powerful mid-range naked bike, the Yamaha MT-09, as that is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. The engine is therefore a real force to be reckoned with, and the brakes, as you’d expect, bite with real ferocity. Fortunately, the engineers haven’t gone overboard with the suspension; the XSR900 offers plenty of comfort, and the upright riding position is more relaxed than one might expect given the engine’s powerful acceleration. Within the retro bike segment, the XSR900 is yet one of the sportiest models overall.

an extremely sporty and revvy engine

excellent brakes

a riding experience on a par with a naked bike

comfortable riding position

high-quality build

value for money

almost too direct responsiveness

the retro style hasn’t been thought through down to the last detail

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2015

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons