Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 are both enduro motorcycles that offer unique features and capabilities.

In terms of engine and drive train, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 has a single-cylinder engine with a bore of 78 mm and a stroke of 86 mm. It produces 24 HP of power and 32 Nm of torque. The bike is equipped with an electric starter and a chain transmission. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has a twin-cylinder engine with a bore of 81 mm and a stroke of 62.6 mm. It delivers a more powerful performance with 71 HP of power and 62 Nm of torque. It also features an electric starter and a chain transmission.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have telescopic forks in the front and swing arm suspension with monoshocks in the rear. However, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 has a front fork diameter of 41 mm and a travel of 200 mm, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has a front fork diameter of 43 mm and a travel of 150 mm. In terms of rear suspension travel, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 offers 180 mm of travel, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 offers 159 mm. Both motorcycles have preload adjustment for the rear suspension.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

In terms of chassis, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 has a steel frame with a double cradle design, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. The choice of materials and frame design can affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the motorcycles.

When it comes to brakes, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 is equipped with a single disk brake in the front, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has double disk brakes in the front. Both motorcycles feature ABS as part of their advanced rider assistance systems.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 has a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire width of 120 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1465 mm and a seat height of 800 mm. The bike has a kerb weight of 199 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire width of 150 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1560 mm and a higher seat height of 830 mm. The bike has a slightly higher kerb weight of 213 kg but offers a larger fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

In terms of strengths, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 offers a good price/performance ratio, robustness, and decelerating capabilities. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has a lively and economical engine, balanced handling, good wind protection, traction control, and ABS as standard. It also has a stylish design resembling its bigger sister, extensive instrumentation with a gear indicator, a 12-volt socket in the cockpit area, and a good price.

In terms of weaknesses, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 is criticized for its brakes and high weight. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 has been noted for having a very restrictive traction control mode 2.

Overall, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 offer different strengths and weaknesses. The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 is more affordable and robust, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 offers a more powerful engine, balanced handling, and additional features. The choice between the two motorcycles ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke86 mmStroke62.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power24 HPEngine power71 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,800 rpm
TorqueTorque32 NmTorque62 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio11.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesOHVValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement411 ccmDisplacement645 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel200 mmTravel150 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel180 mmTravel159 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialSteelMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter260 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,190 mmLength2,275 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth835 mm
HeightHeight1,370 mmHeight1,405 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,560 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)213 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

Since its release, the Royal Enfield Himalayan has enjoyed a large fan community thanks to its classic design and exemplary price-performance ratio. With the 2021 model year, practical details such as ABS that can be deactivated on the rear wheel or the small LCD display with arrow navigation have also been introduced. All in all, however, it remains what it has always stood for: a decelerating companion that is just as ready for the grand tour as it is to cut a good figure in front of the ice cream parlour in the city.

Price/performance ratio

robustness

decelerating

Brake

high weight

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017

The small V-Strom 650 is not only visually close to the big V-Strom 1000 with its pronounced duckbill, stacked headlights and extensive instruments. The equipment does not correspond at all to what is understood by "cheap entry": traction control, lively Euro4 engine, harmonious handling and additional techno-gadgets such as Low RPM Assist or Suzuki Easy Start System. To the delight of the customers, the price is kept within reasonable limits.

Lively, economical engine

balanced handling

good wind protection

traction control and ABS as standard

looks in the style of its big sister

extensive instrumentation with gear indicator

12-volt socket in the cockpit area

good price.

Traction control in mode 2 very restrictive

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Suzuki V-Strom 650

There are a few key differences between a Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 and a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 is about 86% higher. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2017 there are more Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki V-Strom 650 with 89 days compared to 140 days for the Royal Enfield Himalayan. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Royal Enfield Himalayan and 38 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Royal Enfield Himalayan was published on 07/05/2018 and now has more than 77,300 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 650 published on 16/09/2003.

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki V-Strom 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH