Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Compare
MZ 660 Supermoto 2009 vs. Hyosung XRX 125 Supermoto 2009
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2009 vs. Sherco Trial 3.2 4T 2013
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2009
Sherco Trial 3.2 4T 2013
Loading...
Technical Specifications Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2009 compared to Sherco Trial 3.2 4T 2013
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2009
Sherco Trial 3.2 4T 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2009
Sherco Trial 3.2 4T 2013
Engine and Drive Train
Bore
Bore
77 mm
Bore
82 mm
Stroke
Stroke
53.6 mm
Stroke
60 mm
Clutch Type
Clutch Type
Multiplate in oil-bath
Clutch Type
Multiplate in oil-bath
Strokes
Strokes
4-Stroke
Strokes
4-Stroke
Valves per cylinder
Valves per cylinder
4
Valves per cylinder
4
Displacement
Displacement
249.6 ccm
Displacement
317 ccm
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Disc
Dimensions and Weights
Wheelbase
Wheelbase
1,305 mm
Wheelbase
1,322 mm
Seat Height
Seat Height
660 mm
Seat Height
625 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
2.6 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
2.8 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2018 vs
Beta Alp 200 2015
VS.
Beta Evo 300 2T 2020 vs
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2013
VS.
Husqvarna FE 250 2021 vs
Beta Evo 250 4Takt 2015
VS.
Beta Evo 125 2T 2020 vs
Sherco Trial 3.2 4T 2013
VS.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 vs
KTM 790 Adventure 2020
VS.
Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 vs
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
VS.
Yamaha MT-09 2021 vs
BMW F 900 R 2023
VS.
Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 Factory 2021 vs
Triumph Street Triple RS 2023
VS.
Triumph Trophy SE 2013 vs
Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013
VS.
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020 vs
KTM 790 Adventure 2020
VS.
Triumph Street Triple RS 2021 vs
BMW F 900 R 2020
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs
Yamaha MT-09 SP 2023
VS.
KTM 790 Adventure 2023 vs
BMW F 750 GS 2018