Husqvarna WR 300 2011 vs. Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna WR 300 2011

Husqvarna WR 300 2011

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 300 2011 vs Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna WR 300 2011

Husqvarna WR 300 2011

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2011 compared to Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna WR 300 2011
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna WR 300 2011
Husqvarna WR 300 2011
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husaberg TE 300 2012

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height985 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight103 kgDry Weight103 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 300 2011

Husqvarna WR 300 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.

Very wide range of applications

simple but solid two-stroke technology.

none

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUIScalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGSchuberth