Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husqvarna WR 300 2009
Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric, Kick
DisplacementDisplacement293 ccmDisplacement293.2 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104 kgDry Weight104.6 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter thanks to the balancer shaft, the two-stroke has also been lightened, with the 300 now weighing in at 102 kg. The choice for Erzberg, Romaniacs and Co!

Much quieter due to balancer shaft

powerful engine

best balance of weight and performance

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Average Market Price Husqvarna WR 300 vs Husqvarna TE 300

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons