Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 are both enduro motorcycles that offer unique features and capabilities.

Starting with the technical specifications, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 has a bore of 78 mm and a stroke of 86 mm, while the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 has a bore of 81 mm and a stroke of 62.6 mm. In terms of engine power, the Himalayan has 24.5 HP compared to the V-Strom's 49 HP. The Himalayan has a torque of 32 Nm, while the V-Strom has a torque of 60 Nm. Both motorcycles have a chain transmission system and the Himalayan has a displacement of 411 ccm, while the V-Strom has a displacement of 645 ccm.

Moving on to the chassis, the Himalayan has a steel frame with a double cradle design, while the V-Strom has an aluminum frame with a twin-spar design. The V-Strom also has double disk brakes at the front, while the Himalayan has a single disk brake. The front tire diameter of the Himalayan is 21 inches, while the V-Strom has a front tire diameter of 19 inches. The rear tire width of the Himalayan is 120 mm, compared to the V-Strom's 150 mm. Both motorcycles have a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase of the Himalayan is 1465 mm, while the V-Strom has a wheelbase of 1555 mm. The seat height of the Himalayan is 800 mm, while the V-Strom has a seat height of 820 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the Himalayan is 15 liters, while the V-Strom has a larger fuel tank capacity of 22 liters.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

In terms of strengths, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 stands out as a unique eye-catcher with a coherent concept. It offers a high range and a comfortable seat, making long rides more enjoyable. The inclusion of a compass adds to its adventurous appeal. The Himalayan also boasts robust technology and a good price-performance ratio.

On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 has its own set of strengths. It features a good-natured chassis and a relaxed seating position, providing a comfortable riding experience. The V-Strom has a relatively powerful engine and an aggressive exhaust trim, giving it a sporty feel. The addition of handguards adds to the overall functionality and protection. Riders also appreciate the relaxed riding feel that the V-Strom offers.

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses as well. The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 has a front brake that is considered subterranean, meaning it may not provide the desired stopping power. Its performance may also be considered somewhat weak for European standards. Additionally, the Himalayan has a relatively high weight, which may affect maneuverability.

On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 is criticized for not having a really sophisticated look. Some riders also find the windscreen to be a little too small, which may not provide adequate wind protection.

In conclusion, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own unique features and strengths. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be for a unique and adventurous design, or a comfortable and powerful riding experience.

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009
Show all
Same only
Differences
Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020
Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,190 mmLength2,290 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,360 mmHeight1,390 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,555 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity22 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

The workmanship is of a surprisingly high standard for a motorbike that can be had in Germany and Austria for under 5,000 euros. Everything about the little Himalayan looks like it was built to last. Of course, the little Indian can't compete with others in terms of performance data, but it doesn't want to. It is a motorbike for individualists who want to escape society's higher, faster, further - deceleration of the first order.

unique eye-catcher

coherent concept

high range

comfortable seat

compass

robust technology

price-performance ratio

Front brake subterranean

performance somewhat weak for Europe

weight relatively high

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009

In principle, you can do anything with a V-Strom. It is, for example, a faithful hack'n moped that reliably gets you to work day after day. But it's also a weekend bike that you can take to the Kalte Kuchl or the Soboth on a Sunday. And of course, the V-Strom is particularly well suited for extended tours and trips.

Good-natured chassis

relaxed seating position

relatively powerful engine

aggressive exhaust trim

handguards

relaxed riding feel.

Not a really sophisticated look

windscreen a little too small.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Suzuki V-Strom 650

There are a few key differences between a Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 and a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 is about 12% higher. A Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 experiences a loss of 250 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 20 GBP for a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 650 2009 there are less Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki V-Strom 650 with 43 days compared to 143 days for the Royal Enfield Himalayan. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Royal Enfield Himalayan and 38 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Royal Enfield Himalayan was published on 07/05/2018 and now has more than 77,300 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 650 published on 16/09/2003.

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki V-Strom 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGSchuberthContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbH