Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna WR 300 2012
Loading...
Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2012
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husqvarna WR 300 2012
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 72 mm | Bore | 72 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 72 mm | Stroke | 72 mm |
Starter | Starter | Electric, Kick | Starter | Kick |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 2-Stroke | Strokes | 2-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 293.2 ccm | Displacement | 293 ccm |
Suspension Front
Brand | Brand | WP | Brand | Kayaba |
---|
Suspension Rear
Brand | Brand | WP | Brand | Kayaba |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 90 mm | Front tyre width | 90 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 140 mm | Rear tyre width | 140 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 80 % | Rear tyre height | 80 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,475 mm | Wheelbase | 1,465 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 985 mm | Seat Height | 975 mm |
Dry Weight | Dry Weight | 103 kg | Dry Weight | 103 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 11 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 9.5 l |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Husaberg TE 300 2012

The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.
Very wide range of applications
simple but solid two-stroke technology.
none
Husqvarna WR 300 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.