BMW R 1200 R 2014 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW R 1200 R 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Přehled - BMW R 1200 R 2014 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016
The BMW R 1200 R 2014 is a naked bike with a sporty look and a powerful engine. It is equipped with a Boxer engine that produces 110 HP and 119 Nm of torque. The bike has a displacement of 1170 ccm and features a two-cylinder configuration. The front suspension is a Telelever system, while the rear suspension is a Paralever system. The frame type is a load-bearing engine, providing stability and strength. The front brakes are double disk with four pistons and radial technology. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The seat height is 800 mm and the fuel tank capacity is 18 liters. The BMW R 1200 R 2014 comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes.
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is also a naked bike with a powerful and well-controllable engine. It features an inline engine that produces 160 HP and 112 Nm of torque. The bike has a displacement of 999 ccm and features a four-cylinder configuration. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, while the rear suspension is a swing arm system. The frame type is a twin tube, providing rigidity and stability. The front brakes are double disk with four pistons and radial technology, similar to the BMW R 1200 R 2014. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 190 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The seat height is slightly higher than the BMW R 1200 R 2014, at 814 mm, and the fuel tank capacity is slightly lower, at 17.5 liters. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 also offers a comfortable seating position.
BMW R 1200 R 2014
In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1200 R 2014 has a sporty look and a powerful engine. It also offers a good sound and a comfortable seating position. The bike comes with ABS and traction control as standard, providing added safety. Additionally, it offers two riding modes, allowing the rider to choose between different performance settings.
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a powerful and well-controllable engine. It also features a powerful braking system, ensuring excellent stopping power. The bike offers a comfortable seating position, allowing the rider to enjoy long rides without discomfort.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW R 1200 R 2014 has many cool features that are only available at extra cost. Additionally, the speedometer and rev counter are poorly readable, which can be inconvenient for the rider.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers irresistible but expensive optional extras, which can increase the overall cost of the bike. Additionally, the chassis is hard, which can result in a less comfortable ride.
In conclusion, both the BMW R 1200 R 2014 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW R 1200 R 2014 offers a sporty look, a powerful engine, and a comfortable seating position. It comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes. However, it has additional costs for cool features and poorly readable speedometer and rev counter. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position. However, it has expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje BMW R 1200 R 2014 ve srovnání s BMW S 1000 R 2016
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
BMW R 1200 R 2014
Již předchůdce dokázal jezdit sportovně i přesvědčivě na výletech, nový R 1200 R toho umí ještě více - díky systému brašen (samozřejmě za příplatek) není cestování stále žádný problém, ale sportovní jízdu zvládá ještě lépe. Díky nyní částečně vodou chlazenému dvouválcovému motoru boxer je úžasně agilní - 125 koní se na papíře nemusí zdát mnoho, ale motor neuvěřitelně tlačí a navíc se chová kultivovaně. Podvozek a brzdy jsou také velmi dobré a pozice sedadla je sportovní a vzpřímená, což pokrývá široké spektrum od báječné zábavy až po dálkové cestování. Bohužel BMW dokonale rozumí i triku s příplatkovým seznamem. Základní model je dobře vybaven ABS, které lze deaktivovat, kontrolou trakce, kterou lze rovněž deaktivovat, a dvěma jízdními režimy, ale mnoho zajímavých vychytávek je téměř povinných - a samozřejmě zvyšují cenu.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
U BMW S 1000 R je patrná jak blízká příbuznost se superbikem S 1000 RR, tak snaha vybavit stroj vysokou mírou komfortu pro venkovské cesty a každodenní používání. V souladu s tím je čtyřválcová pohonná jednotka o objemu 1000 cm3 brutální, a přesto snadno ovladatelná, a pozice sedadla je odpovídajícím způsobem sportovní a pohodlná. Skutečnost, že S 1000 R patří mezi cenově nejdostupnější výkonné naháče, je překvapivá a velmi potěšující, i když se člověk nesmí chytit seznamu příplatkové výbavy - protože díky mnoha neodolatelným prvkům bude jistě dražší.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena BMW R 1200 R vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 R 2014 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 33% higher. A BMW R 1200 R 2014 experiences a loss of 1,390 USD in one year and 1,580 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 380 USD and 1,940 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2016. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are less BMW R 1200 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 R with 63 days compared to 69 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2007 1000PS.de editors have written 27 reviews for the BMW R 1200 R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW R 1200 R was published on 7/7/2006 and now has more than 14,900 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.
