Yamaha XSR900 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2022
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Genel bakış - Yamaha XSR900 2022 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017
The Yamaha XSR900 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes from Yamaha with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine performance, the Yamaha XSR900 2022 comes out on top with its 119 HP engine power, compared to the 115 HP of the Yamaha MT-09 2017. The XSR900 also has a higher torque of 93 Nm, while the MT-09 has a torque of 87.5 Nm. Both bikes have a liquid-cooled, in-line 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 889ccm for the XSR900 and 847ccm for the MT-09.
Both bikes feature an upside-down telescopic fork for the front suspension and a swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. They also share the same aluminum frame with a twin-tube design. The front brakes on both models are double disk with a diameter of 298 mm.
Yamaha XSR900 2022
When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, the Yamaha XSR900 2022 has a more comprehensive package. It includes ABS, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, a shift assistant with blipper, cruise control, and traction control. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 only has ABS, quickshifter, and traction control.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR900 2022 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1495 mm compared to the 1440 mm of the MT-09 2017. The seat height is also slightly lower on the XSR900 at 810 mm, while the MT-09 has a seat height of 815 mm. Both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also have the same kerb weight of 193 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters for the XSR900 and 14 liters for the MT-09.
Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Yamaha XSR900 2022 stands out for its powerful engine, quickshifter as standard, good brakes, and comprehensive electronics package. It also offers a sporty but everyday ergonomic design and is considered a good value for money option. Additionally, there are many accessories available ex works for customization.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has some unique strengths of its own. It features Öhlins suspension, which is considered an extreme enrichment, and the addition of an Akrapovic exhaust improves both the optics and sound of the bike. The Magura HC3 radial brake pump is highly praised for its performance, and the Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose aesthetics. The combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is also noted for its effectiveness.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Yamaha XSR900 2022 is criticized for its hard seat and low steering angle. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has some drawbacks such as the financial outlay required for modifications, the need for registration of certain parts, and the fact that the ECU flash is not road legal.
In conclusion, while the Yamaha XSR900 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 share many similarities in terms of technical specifications, the XSR900 offers a more comprehensive package with its advanced rider assistance systems and overall performance. However, the MT-09 has its own strengths in terms of suspension, brakes, and aesthetics. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on individual preferences and priorities.
Teknik Özellikler Yamaha XSR900 2022 ile karşılaştırıldığında Yamaha MT-09 2017
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Yamaha XSR900 2022
XSR900, MT-09'u temel aldigi gerçegini gizlemek için hiçbir girisimde bulunmaz. Tam elektronik paketi, güçlü üç silindirli motoru ve sportif süspansiyon bilesenleri ile bu retro motosikleti sürmek inanilmaz derecede sportif. Umarim yakinda daha konforlu bir sele aksesuar olarak sunulur - çünkü standart sele çok fazla duraklama gerektirecektir.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Sonuç olarak, sezon boyunca birkaç duraktan sonra geriye dönüp baktigimda harika bir sonuç elde ettigimi görüyorum. MT-09'umuz hem performans hem de görünüm açisindan mükemmel. Süspansiyon muhtemelen en önemli sorunumuzdu. Daha önce hizli virajlarda arkada açikça (çok fazla) hareket varken, simdi bu sorun gözümü kirpmadan giderildi. STX 46 süspansiyon dikmesi temel konfigürasyonunda oldukça sert, ancak ayni zamanda rahatsiz edici olmadan günlük sürüsle basa çikmayi basariyor. Cömert ayar seçenekleri sayesinde, bireysel tercihler ve uygulamalar için hala yer vardir. NIX 30 kartusunun islevi de etkileyicidir. Tepki davranisi, özellikle yük altinda önemli ölçüde iyilesmistir. Frenleme sirasinda da artik çok daha fazla rezerv mevcut. Daha önce orijinal kurulumla sert bir sekilde sabitlendiginde çatal kilitlenip ABS'yi tetiklerken, simdi frenler daha etkili bir sekilde uygulaniyor. Buna ek olarak, MT-09 artik viraj yariçapinda hedeflenen çizgiyi sanki kendi basina takip ediyor - gerçek bir zevk. Akrapovic komple sistemin görüntüsü ve sesi de saf bir keyif ve birkaç beygir daha üretildigi gerçegi özellikle devir araliginin üst üçte birinde fark ediliyor. Ön tekerlek artik 2. ve 3. viteste daha da istekli bir sekilde galeriye giriyor.
Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2022 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha XSR900 2022 is about 31% higher. A Yamaha XSR900 2022 experiences a loss of 290 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 810 USD for a Yamaha MT-09 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017 there are more Yamaha XSR900 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 59 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 97 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.
