Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. KTM 890 Duke R 2020
Yamaha MT-09 2017
KTM 890 Duke R 2020
Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs KTM 890 Duke R 2020
The Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have inline engines with liquid cooling and fuel injection systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 has a slight advantage with 121 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 115 HP. The KTM also has a larger displacement at 890ccm, while the Yamaha has a displacement of 847ccm. This difference in power and displacement may result in a slightly more powerful and responsive performance from the KTM.
Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. The KTM 890 Duke R 2020 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1482mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 1440mm. This may contribute to a more stable and planted feel on the KTM.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. However, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 has larger diameter disks at 320mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 298mm. This may result in improved braking performance and better heat dissipation on the KTM.
Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. However, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 also offers riding modes, which can provide different performance characteristics and tailor the bike's behavior to different riding conditions.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also have the same fuel tank capacity at 14 liters. However, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 has a slightly higher seat height at 834mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 815mm.
Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 has several strengths, including an Öhlins suspension upgrade, an Akrapovic exhaust for improved aesthetics and sound, a high-performance Magura HC3 radial brake pump, and visually appealing Carbon2Race covers. The combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is also highly effective.
KTM 890 Duke R 2020
On the other hand, the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 boasts a great electronics package, high-quality brakes, an extensively adjustable chassis, a high-revving engine, and playful handling. However, it has slightly nervous tendencies, which may require a looser sitting position to fully enjoy the bike's capabilities.
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 requires a significant financial outlay and a lot of working time for certain modifications. Additionally, some parts may need to be registered, and the ECU flash is not road legal. As for the KTM 890 Duke R 2020, its main weakness is the slightly nervous tendencies that may require a specific sitting position to mitigate.
In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the KTM 890 Duke R 2020 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a more powerful engine, larger brakes, and additional riding modes, while the Yamaha has notable upgrades in suspension, exhaust, and aesthetics. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to KTM 890 Duke R 2020
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Sonuç olarak, sezon boyunca birkaç duraktan sonra geriye dönüp baktigimda harika bir sonuç elde ettigimi görüyorum. MT-09'umuz hem performans hem de görünüm açisindan mükemmel. Süspansiyon muhtemelen en önemli sorunumuzdu. Daha önce hizli virajlarda arkada açikça (çok fazla) hareket varken, simdi bu sorun gözümü kirpmadan giderildi. STX 46 süspansiyon dikmesi temel konfigürasyonunda oldukça sert, ancak ayni zamanda rahatsiz edici olmadan günlük sürüsle basa çikmayi basariyor. Cömert ayar seçenekleri sayesinde, bireysel tercihler ve uygulamalar için hala yer vardir. NIX 30 kartusunun islevi de etkileyicidir. Tepki davranisi, özellikle yük altinda önemli ölçüde iyilesmistir. Frenleme sirasinda da artik çok daha fazla rezerv mevcut. Daha önce orijinal kurulumla sert bir sekilde sabitlendiginde çatal kilitlenip ABS'yi tetiklerken, simdi frenler daha etkili bir sekilde uygulaniyor. Buna ek olarak, MT-09 artik viraj yariçapinda hedeflenen çizgiyi sanki kendi basina takip ediyor - gerçek bir zevk. Akrapovic komple sistemin görüntüsü ve sesi de saf bir keyif ve birkaç beygir daha üretildigi gerçegi özellikle devir araliginin üst üçte birinde fark ediliyor. Ön tekerlek artik 2. ve 3. viteste daha da istekli bir sekilde galeriye giriyor.
KTM 890 Duke R 2020
KTM 890 Duke R eglenceli, kullanimi kolay ancak yüksek kaliteli donanima sahip görünüyor. Motor ve agirlik çok daha küçük motosikletleri animsatiyor. Güç ünitesi canli bir sekilde devirleniyor ve gazi dogrudan açiyor. Motosiklet kolayca dönüyor ve hafif bir sürüse sahip. Bununla birlikte, frenleme ve elektronik paketi büyük liglerdedir. Bu nedenle 890 Duke, köy yollari ve yaris pistleri için hizli ve havali bir motosiklettir.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs KTM 890 Duke R
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a KTM 890 Duke R 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 890 Duke R 2020 is about 33% higher. A Yamaha MT-09 2017 experiences a loss of 810 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 100 USD for a KTM 890 Duke R 2020. Compared to KTM 890 Duke R 2020 there are less Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 18. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 76 days for a KTM 890 Duke R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 15 reviews for the KTM 890 Duke R since model year 2020. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 126,600 views for the first review on KTM 890 Duke R published on 11/5/2019.
