Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 vs. Honda NC750X 2016

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and the Honda NC750X 2016 are both enduro motorcycles, but they have some distinct differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine and drive train, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 has a bore of 84 mm and a stroke of 81.5 mm, while the Honda NC750X 2016 has a bore of 77 mm and a stroke of 80 mm. The Himalayan has a single-cylinder engine with 40 HP of power and 40 Nm of torque, while the NC750X has a twin-cylinder engine with 55 HP of power and 68 Nm of torque. Both bikes have an electric starter and chain transmission.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature a monoshock rear shock absorber. In terms of chassis, the Himalayan has a steel twin-spar frame, while the NC750X has a steel twin-tube, tubular frame.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Himalayan has a front tire diameter of 21 inches, a rear tire width of 140 mm, and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The NC750X has a front tire diameter of 17 inches and a rear tire width of 160 mm. The Himalayan has a wheelbase of 1510 mm, while the NC750X has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1540 mm. The seat height of the Himalayan is 825 mm, while the NC750X has a slightly higher seat height of 830 mm. The Himalayan also has a lower kerb weight of 196 kg compared to the NC750X's 219 kg. Both bikes have ABS and the Himalayan has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters compared to the NC750X's 14.1 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 is praised for its cleanly responsive, low-vibration engine, superbly tuned chassis, good brakes, and modern navigation thanks to TripperDash. It also offers exceptionally good ergonomics when standing and sitting, a fairly high payload, ample standard equipment, and a very long range.

On the other hand, the Honda NC750X 2016 is considered very manageable and affordable, with low fuel consumption. It also features a DCT dual-clutch transmission, adjustable driving modes, and good brakes.

Honda NC750X 2016

However, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 does have some weaknesses. The workmanship could be better, the navigation drains smartphone battery, and the wind protection could be improved.

Similarly, the Honda NC750X 2016 has its weaknesses, including a weak engine and an early onset of the rev limiter.

In conclusion, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and the Honda NC750X 2016 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Himalayan offers a responsive engine, excellent chassis, and good ergonomics, while the NC750X is known for its manageability, affordability, and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.