Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 vs. Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Loading...

Genel bakış - Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

The Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006 are both supersport motorcycles that were released in the same year. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine power, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade takes the lead with 172 HP, compared to the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R's 130 HP. This higher power output gives the Honda an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. Both motorcycles have 4 cylinders, providing a smooth and balanced power delivery. The Honda has a larger displacement of 998 ccm, compared to the Kawasaki's 636 ccm, which contributes to its higher power output.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Honda has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1400 mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 1390 mm. This can contribute to better stability and handling at high speeds for the Honda. The seat height of the Honda is also slightly higher at 831 mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 825 mm. The dry weight of the Honda is 176 kg, while the Kawasaki weighs slightly less at 164 kg. This difference in weight can affect the agility and maneuverability of the motorcycles.

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Honda has a slightly larger capacity of 18 liters, compared to the Kawasaki's 17 liters. This can give the Honda a slight advantage in terms of range and fuel efficiency.

Moving on to the strengths of each motorcycle, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 is known for its agility, comfort, and secure handling. It strikes a good balance between being a high-performance machine and providing a comfortable riding experience. The Honda also offers a good feeling for traction, which can be beneficial in various riding conditions.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006 is praised for its anti-hopping clutch, which helps to prevent rear-wheel lock-up during aggressive downshifting. It is also considered to be a strong overall package, with an optimal chassis and stability. The Kawasaki works well with all types of tires, providing versatility for riders. Additionally, the Ninja ZX-6R is almost complete in terms of its features and capabilities.

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade's peak performance may not be as impressive as some of its competitors in the same class. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R's handling can be unsteady on complex tracks with bumps, and its very sporty overall set-up may be an advantage on the racetrack but a disadvantage on the road.

In conclusion, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006 are both powerful supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Honda offers a higher power output and a more comfortable riding experience, while the Kawasaki excels in terms of its clutch system, chassis, and overall package. Ultimately, the choice between these two motorcycles will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.

Teknik Özellikler Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 ile karşılaştırıldığında Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Motor ve Aktarma Organı

Motor gücüMotor gücü172 HPMotor gücü130 HP
ŞanzımanŞanzımanZincirŞanzımanZincir
SilindirlerSilindirler4Silindirler4
StroklarStroklar4 ZamanlıStroklar4 Zamanlı
SoğutmaSoğutmasıvıSoğutmasıvı
HacimHacim998 ccmHacim636 ccm

Boyutlar ve ağırlıklar

Aks mesafesiAks mesafesi1,400 mmAks mesafesi1,390 mm
Koltuk yüksekliğiKoltuk yüksekliği831 mmKoltuk yüksekliği825 mm
Kuru AğırlıkKuru Ağırlık176 kgKuru Ağırlık164 kg
Yakıt Deposu KapasitesiYakıt Deposu Kapasitesi18 lYakıt Deposu Kapasitesi17 l
Azami hızAzami hız287 km/saatAzami hız265 km/saat
Lisansa uygunlukLisansa uygunlukALisansa uygunlukA

Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri

Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006

Bir canavarin fatihleri olarak müdavimler masasinda 1000cc sürücüsü olarak geçmek isteyen sert adamlar CBR'a uzanmamalidir. Fireblade 600cc'ye yeni baslayanlari zorlamaz. Kisisel limitinize sasirtici bir kolaylikla yaklasmanizi saglar. Aslinda bu özellik Fireblade'in piyasadaki diger 1000cc motosikletlere göre en büyük avantajidir.

Çeviklik

konfor

altin ortalama

güvenli kullanim

iyi çekis hissi

En iyi performans

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006

Kawa arzulanan hiçbir seyi birakmaz. Motor, sasi ve frenler sizi %100 tatmin edecektir. Bu makine yogun tur zamanlarini düsürecek, sürücü bile bunu engelleyemeyecek.

Atlama önleyici debriyaj

güçlü genel paket

optimum sasi

denge

tüm lastiklerle çalisir

neredeyse eksiksiz.

Tümsekli karmasik yollarda dengesiz yol tutusu

çok sportif genel kurulum => yaris pisti için avantaj, yol için dezavantaj

Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R

There are a few key differences between a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2006 and a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2006. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade with 47 days compared to 50 days for a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade and 37 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R since model year 2005. The first review for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade was published on 11/25/2003 and now has more than 3,700 views. This compares to more than 5,800 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R published on 9/2/2002.

Fiyat Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Model yılı
Mevcut ortalama piyasa fiyatları

Fiyat Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R

Model yılı
Mevcut ortalama piyasa fiyatları

Alternatif Karşılaştırmalar