Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2013

The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several differences between the two models that make each unique.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 has the advantage with 115 HP compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010's 106 HP. This extra power provides a more exhilarating ride and quicker acceleration. Additionally, the MT-09 has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the FZ-8N's 82 Nm, which further enhances its performance.

Another notable difference is the number of cylinders. The FZ-8N has a 4-cylinder engine, while the MT-09 has a 3-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration can affect the overall performance and sound of the bike.

In terms of suspension, the FZ-8N 2010 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, while the MT-09 2013 has a telescopic fork. Both provide a comfortable and stable ride, but the Upside-Down fork on the FZ-8N may offer slightly better performance in terms of handling and stability.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

When it comes to the chassis, the FZ-8N 2010 has a Deltabox frame type, while the MT-09 2013 has a Twin Tube frame type. Both frames are known for their strength and rigidity, but the Twin Tube frame on the MT-09 may offer better weight distribution and handling characteristics.

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes on the front, providing excellent stopping power and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the FZ-8N has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the MT-09's 1440 mm. Both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters, ensuring good traction and stability. The seat height is also the same at 815 mm.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

However, there are some differences in weight and fuel tank capacity. The FZ-8N has a higher kerb weight of 211 kg compared to the MT-09's 188 kg. This difference in weight may affect maneuverability and agility. Additionally, the FZ-8N has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters, while the MT-09 has a smaller capacity of 14 liters. This means that the FZ-8N may have a longer range before needing to refuel.

In terms of strengths, the FZ-8N 2010 offers a sporty engine performance, a beefy appearance, a pleasant driving feel, and is relatively fast. On the other hand, the MT-09 2013 is praised for its reasonable price and powerful engine.

However, there are also weaknesses to consider. The FZ-8N's exhaust canister is criticized for its negative visual appearance. Meanwhile, the MT-09 has a hard chassis, which may affect comfort, and a higher fuel consumption.

Overall, both the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The FZ-8N offers a sporty and fast ride with a beefy appearance, while the MT-09 provides a powerful engine at a reasonable price. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.