KTM 690 Duke R 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016
KTM 690 Duke R 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Genel bakış - KTM 690 Duke R 2013 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016
The KTM 690 Duke R 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both popular naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths.
Starting with the technical specifications, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 is equipped with a 1-cylinder engine that delivers 70 horsepower and 70 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a 2-cylinder engine that produces 75 horsepower and 68 Nm of torque. Both bikes have liquid cooling systems and similar engine displacements, with the KTM at 690cc and the Yamaha at 689cc.
In terms of suspension, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 features an upside-down telescopic fork, while the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a telescopic fork. The KTM also boasts WP suspension elements, which contribute to its superior performance and handling.
KTM 690 Duke R 2013
When it comes to the chassis, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 has a chromium-molybdenum frame, which is known for its strength and durability. The Yamaha MT-07 2016, on the other hand, has a steel frame.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1466mm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 1400mm. The seat height of the KTM is also higher at 865mm, while the Yamaha has a lower seat height of 805mm. The KTM is lighter with a kerb weight of 149.5kg, while the Yamaha weighs 179kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.
Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 stands out with its monobloc brakes, Akrapovic exhaust, and higher lean angle clearance. These features contribute to its exceptional braking performance and sporty appeal.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a very agile engine and offers very easy handling. Its low weight makes it easy to maneuver, and its aggressively angular look adds to its aesthetic appeal. The bike also boasts powerful brakes, a comfortable seating position, and a throaty sound. The extensive and easy-to-read display is another advantage of the Yamaha.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
However, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 does have some weaknesses. It lacks comfort and weather protection, which may make long rides less enjoyable.
Similarly, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a few weaknesses as well. The chassis is considered a little soft, and the footrests may drag in certain situations. Some riders also find that the bike has some cheap plastic parts, and the telescopic fork is not as exciting as the other features.
In conclusion, both the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers superior performance with its monobloc brakes and WP suspension elements, while the Yamaha impresses with its agile engine and easy handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Teknik Özellikler KTM 690 Duke R 2013 ile karşılaştırıldığında Yamaha MT-07 2016
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
KTM 690 Duke R 2013
KTM 690 Duke R'in daha iyi bir motosiklet oldugu, sadece iki makinenin dis görünüsüne bakilarak bile anlasilabilir. Akrapovic egzoz ve WP süspansiyon elemanlari basitçe daha iyi çalisiyor ve daha iyi ses veriyor.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
MT-07, sürüsü son derece sportif olan inanilmaz eglenceli bir makinedir. Frenler güçlü, yol tutusu muhtesem ve motor su anda bu siniftaki açik ara en çevik motor - hatta daha da iyi.
Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı KTM 690 Duke R vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke R 2013 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 65 days for the KTM 690 Duke R. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke R and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke R was published on 12/2/2009 and now has more than 23,900 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.
