Ducati Monster 696 2013 vs. Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Loading...

Genel bakış - Ducati Monster 696 2013 vs Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

The Ducati Monster 696 and the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo are both naked bikes from the 2013 model year. While they share some similarities in terms of engine power, torque, and suspension brands, there are also notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the Ducati Monster 696 is equipped with a 696cc engine that produces 80 horsepower and 69 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo features a larger 1078cc engine that delivers 100 horsepower and 103 Nm of torque. This means that the Monster 1100 Evo has a more powerful engine, offering greater acceleration and top speed compared to the Monster 696.

Both models have a 2-cylinder engine and air cooling, which is a characteristic of Ducati motorcycles. This type of cooling system provides simplicity and reliability, but it may not be as effective as liquid cooling in extreme conditions.

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

In terms of suspension, both the Monster 696 and the Monster 1100 Evo are equipped with Sachs suspension components. This brand is known for its high-quality and performance-oriented suspension systems, providing a comfortable and controlled ride. This ensures that both bikes offer a smooth and stable handling experience.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both models have similar front tire width and diameter, with 120 mm and 17 inches respectively. However, there is a difference in the rear tire width, with the Monster 696 having a 160 mm width and the Monster 1100 Evo having a wider 180 mm width. This wider rear tire on the Monster 1100 Evo provides increased traction and stability during cornering.

Both bikes have the same wheelbase of 1450 mm, which contributes to their stability and maneuverability. However, there is a difference in seat height, with the Monster 696 having a lower seat height of 770 mm compared to the Monster 1100 Evo's 810 mm. This means that the Monster 696 is more accessible for riders with shorter inseams, while the Monster 1100 Evo may be more suitable for taller riders.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Monster 696 has a larger capacity of 15 liters compared to the Monster 1100 Evo's 13.5 liters. This means that the Monster 696 has a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Moving on to the strengths and weaknesses of each model, the Monster 696 is praised for its top engine performance, high-quality components, and the distinctive throaty sound that is characteristic of Ducati motorcycles. However, it is criticized for its high price and poorly readable fittings.

On the other hand, the Monster 1100 Evo is praised for its enormous torque, which provides a thrilling riding experience, and its manageability, making it easy to handle even in challenging situations. However, it is criticized for its noticeable load changes and poorly readable instruments.

In conclusion, the Ducati Monster 696 and the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo are both impressive naked bikes from the 2013 model year. While the Monster 696 offers a top engine performance and high-quality components, the Monster 1100 Evo stands out with its enormous torque and manageability. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Teknik Özellikler Ducati Monster 696 2013 ile karşılaştırıldığında Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013
Tümünü göster
Sadece aynı olanlar
Farklılıklar
Ducati Monster 696 2013
Ducati Monster 696 2013
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Arka Frenler

TipiTipiDiskTipiDisk

Boyutlar ve ağırlıklar

Ön lastik genişliğiÖn lastik genişliği120 mmÖn lastik genişliği120 mm
Ön lastik yüksekliğiÖn lastik yüksekliği60 %Ön lastik yüksekliği70 %
Ön lastik çapıÖn lastik çapı17 inçÖn lastik çapı17 inç
Arka lastik genişliğiArka lastik genişliği160 mmArka lastik genişliği180 mm
Arka lastik yüksekliğiArka lastik yüksekliği60 %Arka lastik yüksekliği55 %
Arka lastik çapıArka lastik çapı17 inçArka lastik çapı17 inç
Aks mesafesiAks mesafesi1,450 mmAks mesafesi1,450 mm
Koltuk yüksekliğiKoltuk yüksekliği770 mmKoltuk yüksekliği810 mm
Yakıt Deposu KapasitesiYakıt Deposu Kapasitesi15 lYakıt Deposu Kapasitesi13.5 l
Lisansa uygunlukLisansa uygunlukALisansa uygunlukA

Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri

Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati harika görünüyor, yüksek kaliteli bilesenlere sahip, iyi ses veren bir motoru var, ancak ne yazik ki yüksek bir fiyati da var.

Üst düzey motor

yüksek kaliteli bilesenler

güçlü Ducati sesi

yüksek fiyat

kötü okunabilir baglanti parçalari

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Klasik, zarif sportifligin modern tanimidir.

Muazzam tork

son derece kullanisli

Fark edilebilir yük degisiklikleri

zayif okunakli baglanti parçalari

Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Ducati Monster 696 vs Ducati Monster 1100 Evo

There are a few key differences between a Ducati Monster 696 2013 and a Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 696 with 55 days compared to 92 days for a Ducati Monster 1100 Evo. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 and 5 reviews for the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo since model year 2010. The first review for the Ducati Monster 696 was published on 11/8/2007 and now has more than 7,300 views. This compares to more than 16,000 views for the first review on Ducati Monster 1100 Evo published on 5/19/2011.

Fiyat Ducati Monster 696

Model yılı
Mevcut ortalama piyasa fiyatları

Fiyat Ducati Monster 1100 Evo

Model yılı
Mevcut ortalama piyasa fiyatları

Alternatif Karşılaştırmalar

1000PS İş Ortağı

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen