Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Compare
TGB Target 550 4x4 IRS 2012 vs. Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
TGB Tapo RS 2011 vs. Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009
TGB Tapo RS 2011
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009
Loading...
Technical Specifications TGB Tapo RS 2011 compared to Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009
TGB Tapo RS 2011
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009
Show all
Same only
Differences
TGB Tapo RS 2011
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009
Motor och drivlina
Transmissionstyp
Transmissionstyp
Variomatic
Transmissionstyp
Variomatic
Takter
Takter
Tvåtakt
Takter
Tvåtakt
Slagvolym
Slagvolym
49 cm3
Slagvolym
49.9 cm3
Mått och vikter
Torrvikt
Torrvikt
89 kg
Torrvikt
109 kg
Bränsletankskapacitet
Bränsletankskapacitet
6.8 l
Bränsletankskapacitet
7.8 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009 vs
Yamaha Aerox 2016
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009 vs
Peugeot Speedfight 3 50 2T AC 2010
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 Iceblade 2017 vs
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2011
Peugeot Speedfight 3 50 Wasser 2011 vs
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2011
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009 vs
Yamaha Aerox R 2009
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2014 vs
Gilera Runner 50 2T SP 2013
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2011
Peugeot Speedfight 4 50 Darkside 2015 vs
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2011
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2013
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2013 vs
Gilera Runner 50 2T SP 2013
VS.
Peugeot Speedfight 3 125 2016 vs
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2017
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009 vs
Peugeot Jet Force 125 2007
VS.
Sym Jet 4 50 R 2011 vs
TGB Tapo RS 2013
VS.
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2009 vs
Peugeot Kisbee 50 Streetline 2022
VS.
Peugeot Speedfight 3 125 2015 vs
Peugeot Jet Force 50 C-Tech 2017
1000PS Partner
