BMW S 1000 XR 2021 vs. BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019

The BMW S 1000 XR 2021 and the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019 are both sport touring motorcycles that offer different strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the BMW S 1000 XR 2021, it is equipped with an inline four-cylinder engine that delivers 165 HP and 114 Nm of torque. This powerful engine provides a broad usable rev band and is known for its great response and performance. The bike also features a chain transmission and a displacement of 999 ccm. In terms of suspension, it has an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The suspension is electronically adjustable and offers compression, preload, and rebound adjustments. The frame is made of aluminum and has a twin tube, load-bearing engine design. The bike is equipped with double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 320 mm and radial technology. It also comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as suspension electronically adjustable, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, and traction control. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 190 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1552 mm, a seat height of 840 mm, a kerb weight of 226 kg (with ABS), and a fuel tank capacity of 20 l. The equipment includes LED daytime running lights, LED headlights, a TFT display, and an adjustable windscreen.

BMW S 1000 XR 2021

On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019 features a boxer twin-cylinder engine that delivers 136 HP and 143 Nm of torque. This engine is known for its bulbous torque and clean response. It has a prop shaft transmission and a displacement of 1254 ccm. The front suspension consists of a telelever system with a diameter of 37 mm and a travel of 210 mm. The rear suspension is a single swing arm with a monoshock and offers preload and rebound adjustments. The frame is made of steel and has a load-bearing engine design. The bike is equipped with double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 305 mm and radial technology. The advanced rider assistance systems include ABS, anti-slipping control, riding modes, and ride by wire. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 19 inches, a rear tire width of 170 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1504 mm, a seat height of 890 mm, a kerb weight of 268 kg (with ABS), and a fuel tank capacity of 30 l. The equipment includes LED headlights and an adjustable windscreen.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 XR 2021 offers riding modes that allow for a change in response behavior suitable for practical use. The bike also has a great rev-happy four-cylinder engine with a broad usable rev band. The electronic chassis with automatic recognition of the load condition ensures a well-balanced vehicle, even with a pillion passenger. Additionally, the bike has good brakes. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019 provides great ride comfort, an extreme range, and good ergonomics. It also offers excellent weather protection and has a bulbous torque with clean response. The bike's low center of gravity contributes to its generally good rideability. Furthermore, it offers customization options.

BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 XR 2021 has a knee angle on long tours that may be a bit narrow for tall people. The suspension damping is not sensitive enough, making it difficult to find a truly comfortable setup. Additionally, the bike has a high fuel consumption. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019 has a high weight that is noticeable in the braking zone. It also comes with a high price tag.

Overall, the BMW S 1000 XR 2021 and the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2019 are both capable sport touring motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 XR offers a powerful engine and advanced rider assistance systems, while the R 1250 GS Adventure provides great ride comfort and customization options. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.