KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2017

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs BMW S 1000 R 2017

The KTM 690 Duke 2013 is a lightweight naked bike with a 68 HP engine and 70 Nm of torque. It has a single cylinder engine with liquid cooling and a displacement of 690 ccm. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork and the frame is made of chromium-molybdenum. The front brakes have four pistons and use radial technology. The bike also features advanced rider assistance systems such as ride by wire. The front tire width is 120 mm with a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire width is 160 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1466 mm and the seat height is 835 mm. The fuel tank capacity is 14 liters.

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 is a more powerful naked bike with a 165 HP engine and 114 Nm of torque. It has a four-cylinder engine with liquid cooling and a displacement of 999 ccm. The front suspension is also an upside-down telescopic fork, but the frame is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design. The front brakes have four pistons and use radial technology. The bike features advanced rider assistance systems such as dynamic suspension. The front tire width is 120 mm with a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire width is 190 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is slightly shorter at 1439 mm and the seat height is 814 mm. The fuel tank capacity is larger at 17.5 liters.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 is praised for its light weight, sufficient power, and low consumption. It provides a nimble and agile riding experience. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 is known for having the best shift assistant in the naked bike league, a powerful engine with an awesome sound, and great handling. It is considered a universal motorcycle without any real weaknesses. It also offers a wide range of equipment and accessory options, powerful brakes, and a semi-active suspension that eliminates the need for setup adjustments.

However, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 does have some weaknesses. It does not have chassis adjustment options, limiting customization and fine-tuning for individual preferences. Additionally, it may lack in terms of comfort, especially for longer rides.

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Similarly, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 has a few weaknesses. The original equipment tires are not considered the finest premium goods, which may impact the bike's performance and handling. On the racetrack, the seating position is described as slightly inactive, which may affect the rider's control and maneuverability.

In conclusion, while the KTM 690 Duke 2013 offers a lightweight and efficient option with sufficient power, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 provides a more powerful and versatile naked bike with a range of advanced features and options. However, both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses that should be considered based on individual preferences and riding needs.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 690 Duke 2013 v primerjavi z BMW S 1000 R 2017

KTM 690 Duke 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2017

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina102 mmIzvrtina80 mm
GibGib84.5 mmGib49.7 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja68 KMMoč motorja165 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči7,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči11,000 min-1
NavorNavor70 NmNavor114 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru5,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru9,250 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje12
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli, Preprečevanje poskakovanja kolesa
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri4
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina690 cm3Gibna prostornina999 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirAluminij
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaDvojna cev

Sprednje zavore

BatBatŠtirje batiBatŠtirje bati
TehnologijaTehnologijaRadialnaTehnologijaRadialna

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
BatBatEn batBatEn bat
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljust

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomVodenje po žiciNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomDinamično vzmetenje

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike160 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,466 mmMedosna razdalja1,439 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža835 mmVišina sedeža814 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo14 lProstornina posode za gorivo17.5 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Leta 2017 se je izboljšal tudi BMW-jev univerzalni talent. BMW ponuja najširši razpon uporabe in izjemno kultiviran motor, odličen menjalnik in najboljšega pomočnika za prestavljanje na tem področju. Vozi se preprosto, a hitro. V vozilu sedite precej nizko.

Najboljši pomočnik za prestavljanje v ligi nakedbike

univerzalni motocikel brez pravih slabosti

zmogljiv motor, odličen zvok, odlična vodljivost

na dirkališču nekoliko preveč neaktiven položaj pri vožnji

zelo širok nabor opreme in dodatne opreme

zelo zmogljive zavore

zaradi polaktivnega vzmetenja je nastavljanje odveč.

Pnevmatike originalne opreme niso najboljše vrhunsko blago

neaktivni sedež na dirkališču

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 690 Duke vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a BMW S 1000 R 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2017 is about 141% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2017 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 22. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 60 days compared to 97 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Cena KTM 690 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena BMW S 1000 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH