BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2022
BMW S 1000 R 2022
Yamaha MT-07 2022
Pregled - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs Yamaha MT-07 2022
The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Yamaha MT-07 2022 are both naked bikes that offer different features and performance levels.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 R is equipped with a powerful in-line 4-cylinder engine that delivers 165 HP of power and 114 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 features a 2-cylinder in-line engine that produces 73.4 HP of power and 67 Nm of torque. This makes the BMW S 1000 R significantly more powerful than the Yamaha MT-07.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have a swing arm rear suspension with a monoshock absorber. However, the BMW S 1000 R has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, while the Yamaha MT-07 has a regular telescopic fork front suspension. This gives the BMW S 1000 R an advantage in terms of suspension technology.
BMW S 1000 R 2022
When it comes to the chassis, the BMW S 1000 R has an aluminum frame, which is known for its lightweight and rigid characteristics. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 has a steel frame, which is generally heavier but provides good stability. This gives the BMW S 1000 R an edge in terms of weight and handling.
In terms of brakes, both bikes are equipped with double disk front brakes. However, the BMW S 1000 R has larger diameter disks (320 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-07 (298 mm). This gives the BMW S 1000 R better braking performance and stopping power.
In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R offers a wide range of features including ABS, hill start assist, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, quickshifter, traction control, and anti-wheelie. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 only has ABS as an advanced rider assistance system. This makes the BMW S 1000 R more advanced and technologically equipped.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R has a slightly wider front tire (120 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-07 (120 mm). Both bikes have the same front tire diameter (17 inches). The BMW S 1000 R has a wider rear tire (190 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-07 (180 mm). Both bikes have the same rear tire diameter (17 inches). The BMW S 1000 R has a longer wheelbase (1450 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-07 (1400 mm). The seat height of the BMW S 1000 R is slightly higher (830 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-07 (805 mm). The BMW S 1000 R is also heavier (199 kg) compared to the Yamaha MT-07 (184 kg). However, the Yamaha MT-07 has a larger fuel tank capacity (14 liters) compared to the BMW S 1000 R (16.5 liters). The Yamaha MT-07 also has a longer range (333 km) compared to the BMW S 1000 R (266 km). The Yamaha MT-07 also has a lower combined fuel consumption (4.2 l/100km) compared to the BMW S 1000 R (6.2 l/100km).
Yamaha MT-07 2022
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R is known for its powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and extensive range of accessories. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 is praised for its lively and powerful engine, good sound, comfortable seating position, good braking system, and easy-to-read instruments.
However, the BMW S 1000 R does have some weaknesses, including a sluggish shift assistant and optics that are not 100% coherent. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 lacks adjustable chassis and does not have a TFT display.
In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 offers a more powerful engine, better suspension technology, advanced rider assistance systems, and a wider range of accessories compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2022. However, the Yamaha MT-07 has its own strengths such as a comfortable seating position, good sound, and easy-to-read instruments. Ultimately, the choice between the two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehnične specifikacije BMW S 1000 R 2022 v primerjavi z Yamaha MT-07 2022
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
BMW S 1000 R 2022
Sedežni položaj je športen, vendar nikakor ne neudoben, zavore so močne, motor modela S 1000 R pa je najboljši - morda celo nekoliko preveč homogen. Tudi na področju vožnje se ni mogoče pritoževati. Na podlagi čistih podatkov o zmogljivosti in vgrajenih elektronskih funkcij ima BMW verjetno vse potrebno za najhitrejši čas kroga. In to na kakršni koli podlagi, saj lahko s polaktivnim vzmetenjem na slabih cestah, posejanih z luknjami, požirate kilometer za kilometrom. Na žalost se ta občutek superiornosti ni nikoli zares prenesel na voznika. Verjetno je to slaba stran prevelike uravnoteženosti na vseh področjih - vsaj v mojih italijanofilskih očeh. BMW-ju je manjkalo tisto nekaj, karizma, ki jo je težko razložiti, a vzbuja pristna čustva.
Yamaha MT-07 2022
Hardly any other motorbike in the so-called entry-level class is as much fun as the Yamaha MT-07. Even the version that is throttled down to 48 hp can keep up with the full version for longer than you would expect due to its comparatively large displacement. The remaining components also do well, both the brakes and the suspension don't want to scare anyone with too much harshness, but don't immediately reach the limit even with sportier riders. The look is now more coherent, the minimalist LED headlight fits in perfectly with the angular look.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen BMW S 1000 R vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a Yamaha MT-07 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2022 is about 136% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2022 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 52. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 109 days for a Yamaha MT-07. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.
