Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
The Yamaha MT-09 2016 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications, but they have some notable differences.
In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is the clear winner with 152 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 115 HP. The Suzuki also has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This means that the Suzuki will provide a more powerful and exhilarating riding experience.
Both bikes have inline engines and four cylinders, but the Yamaha has a smaller displacement of 847 ccm compared to the Suzuki's 999 ccm. This means that the Suzuki will have a slight advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed.
In terms of suspension, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. This means that the Suzuki may provide better stability and handling in corners.
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, which provides good rigidity and stability. They also both have double disk front brakes, which offer good stopping power.
In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Suzuki has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Yamaha's 180 mm. This may provide better traction and stability for the Suzuki.
The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a wheelbase of 1440 mm, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm. This may result in slightly better stability and straight-line performance for the Suzuki.
In terms of seat height, the Yamaha has a seat height of 815 mm, while the Suzuki has a slightly lower seat height of 810 mm. This may make the Suzuki more accessible for riders with shorter legs.
The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a kerb weight of 191 kg, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 214 kg. This may result in slightly slower acceleration and handling for the Suzuki.
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Suzuki has a larger fuel tank capacity of 19 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters. This means that the Suzuki will have a longer range and require fewer fuel stops.
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, three power modes, a fully adjustable chassis, a quickshifter as standard, a sporty upright seating position, good brakes, aggressive looks, and traction control. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has a superior engine, an excellent shift assistant including blipper, balanced handling, a bold design, a comfortable seating position, and a very good price.
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that may be a little too hard for long tours and a licence plate holder on the swingarm that offers less splash protection than a conventional one. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has a less comprehensive electronics package, no 6-axis IMU, no cornering ABS, instruments on the handlebars that are somewhat antiquated, and a display that is not particularly easy to read.
Overall, both the Yamaha MT-09 2016 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 are powerful and capable naked bikes, but the Suzuki offers a more powerful engine and some additional features at a slightly higher weight. The choice between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2016 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Yamahi MT-09 za prihajajočo sezono ni bilo treba na novo izumljati - že pred skoraj štirimi leti je bila izjemno dobro izdelana. Namesto tega so se Japonci osredotočili na fino prilagoditev in dodajanje praktičnih, sodobnih trikov, kot sta nadzor vleke in samodejno prestavljanje. Zaradi standarda Euro4 pa je bilo upravljanje motorja ponovno spremenjeno in v standardnem načinu ponuja izrazito zmogljivo, a dobro nadzorovano podajanje moči; eksplozije moči prve generacije zdaj ne ponuja več niti ostrejši način A. Največja sprememba, prepoznavna že na prvi pogled, je po mojem mnenju izjemno uspešen dizajn z agresivnejšim sprednjim delom in na novo oblikovanim zadkom. V celoti gledano, še bolj eleganten naked bike, ki je bil očitno ustvarjen za užitek v vožnji z motorjem.
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
The new GSX-S1000 is an old acquaintance in terms of basic design - the engine and chassis are still from the predecessor. However, the machine has been modernised in many areas and presents itself at an extremely high level, especially visually. Although the engine cannot compete in the league of the super-potent Hyper Nakeds, it functions very harmoniously and powerfully enough. The conventional chassis also strikes a successful compromise between sportiness and comfort. The hammer arguments are definitely the successful design, the standard quickshifter with blipper and, last but not least, the comparatively low price.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2016 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is about 66% higher. A Yamaha MT-09 2016 experiences a loss of 420 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,510 USD for a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 there are less Yamaha MT-09 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 11 compared to 28. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 87 days compared to 130 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 9/27/2014.
