BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

Loading...

Pregled - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

The BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 are both powerful naked bikes that offer thrilling riding experiences. However, they have some notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 takes the lead with 173 HP, while the BMW S 1000 R 2015 offers 160 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque of 144 Nm compared to the BMW's 112 Nm. This gives the KTM an advantage in terms of acceleration and overall power delivery.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspensions, providing excellent handling and stability. The BMW has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the KTM uses a chromium-molybdenum frame with a tubular design. These differences in frame material and design may result in variations in weight and handling characteristics.

When it comes to braking systems, both bikes have four-piston front brakes with radial technology. However, the KTM goes a step further by using monoblock technology, which enhances braking performance even further.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 offers dynamic suspension, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 includes ABS and traction control. The KTM's additional electronic aids provide enhanced safety and control during aggressive riding.

Both bikes have similar front and rear tire dimensions, with a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The KTM has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1482 mm compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. This may result in differences in stability and maneuverability.

In terms of seat height, the KTM has a higher seat at 835 mm compared to the BMW's 814 mm. This may make the KTM more suitable for taller riders.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

When it comes to fuel tank capacity, the KTM has a slightly larger tank with 18 liters compared to the BMW's 17.5 liters. This may result in a slightly longer range for the KTM.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comparatively comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is known for its monstrous engine and torque, wide rev range, strong brakes, extensive electronics, great extras, high-quality details, and unrivaled aggressive looks.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2015 is criticized for its expensive optional extras, hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars. The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016's only notable weakness is its automatic gearshift, which some riders find a little too coarse.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to personal preference and riding style.

Tehnične specifikacije BMW S 1000 R 2015 v primerjavi z KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2015
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina80 mmIzvrtina108 mm
GibGib49.7 mmGib71 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja160 KMMoč motorja173 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči11,000 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči8,870 min-1
NavorNavor112 NmNavor144 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru9,250 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru6,500 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12 Kompresijsko razmerje13.2
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli, Preprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesa
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri4Cilindri2
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina999 cm3Gibna prostornina1,301 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirKrom-molibden
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaDvojna cevTip okvirjaCevast

Sprednje zavore

BatBatŠtirje batiBatŠtirje bati
TehnologijaTehnologijaRadialnaTehnologijaRadialna, Monoblok

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
BatBatEn batBatDva bata
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljust

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomDinamično vzmetenjeNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS, Nadzor zdrsavanja koles

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike55 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,439 mmMedosna razdalja1,482 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža814 mmVišina sedeža835 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo17.5 lProstornina posode za gorivo18 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM ne pozna vrnitve nazaj in KTM ne pozna zadrege. Zato je novi 1290 Super Duke R nekoliko lažje obvladljiv kot njegov predhodnik, hkrati pa je tudi nekoliko močnejši in hitrejši. Že pri 2500 vrtljajih na minuto je na voljo več kot 100 Nm, največja vrednost je 141, največja zmogljivost pa je navedena pri 177 KM. To je morda preveč, vendar ni nujno, da je. Elektronika ostaja rešilna bilka v tej kategoriji, kjer razvoj še naprej močno napreduje. KTM je začel tam, kjer je imel težave, in to je bila stabilnost. Spremembe geometrije in podvozja so to občutno izboljšale, zato vožnja z zverino ni le hitrejša, temveč tudi varnejša. Upravljanje zaradi tega ni nič manj radikalno, geni supermota pa so bolj očitni kot na katerem koli drugem golem motociklu. Super Duke je lahko samo en.

Pošasten motor in navor

širok razpon vrtljajev

malo vibracij

močne zavore

bogata elektronika

odlična dodatna oprema

visokokakovostne podrobnosti

neprekosljiv agresiven videz.

Samodejno prestavljanje nekoliko preveč grobo

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is about 8% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2015 experiences a loss of 250 USD in one year and 600 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 670 USD and 1,840 USD for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016. Compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 25. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 81 days for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,900 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke R published on 11/8/2012.

Cena BMW S 1000 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave