BMW G 310 R 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Loading...

Pregled - BMW G 310 R 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2016

The BMW G 310 R and the KTM 390 Duke are both naked bikes from the year 2016. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW G 310 R is equipped with a 313cc single-cylinder engine that produces 34 horsepower and 28 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke features a slightly larger 373.2cc single-cylinder engine that delivers 44 horsepower and 35 Nm of torque. This gives the KTM 390 Duke an advantage in terms of power, providing a more thrilling riding experience.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. This design helps to improve stability and handling, making them suitable for both city riding and more spirited rides on winding roads.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW G 310 R has a steel frame, while the KTM 390 Duke boasts a chromium-molybdenum frame. The KTM's frame is known for its strength and rigidity, which enhances the bike's overall stability and handling.

In terms of braking, both bikes have single disk brakes at the front. This provides adequate stopping power, ensuring safety while riding. However, the BMW G 310 R has been noted to have a weakness in the brake pedal, which may require some adjustments or modifications for optimal performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW G 310 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1374mm compared to the KTM 390 Duke's 1367mm. The seat height of the BMW G 310 R is also slightly lower at 785mm, while the KTM 390 Duke has a seat height of 800mm. These differences in dimensions may affect the overall riding experience and comfort for different riders.

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

When it comes to weight, the KTM 390 Duke has a significant advantage, weighing only 139kg with ABS compared to the BMW G 310 R's 158.5kg with ABS. This lower weight contributes to the KTM's high fun factor and nimble handling, making it a popular choice for riders who prioritize agility and maneuverability.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, both bikes have an 11-liter capacity, providing a decent range for city commuting and shorter rides.

In summary, the BMW G 310 R excels in handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke stands out for its low weight, sufficient power, high fun factor, and low consumption. However, the BMW G 310 R has been noted to have a weakness in the brake pedal, while the KTM 390 Duke has been criticized for its sluggish clutch and small geometry. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehnične specifikacije BMW G 310 R 2016 v primerjavi z KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina80 mmIzvrtina89 mm
GibGib62 mmGib60 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja34 KMMoč motorja44 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1
NavorNavor28 NmNavor35 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,250 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje10.6 Kompresijsko razmerje12.6
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina313 cm3Gibna prostornina373.2 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Zadnje vzmetenje

Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaneposredniPritrditev amortizerjaneposredni

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirJekloOkvirKrom-molibden
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaCevast

Sprednje zavore

VrstaVrstaEnojni kolutVrstaEnojni kolut

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike60 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,374 mmMedosna razdalja1,367 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža785 mmVišina sedeža800 mm
Lastna masa (z ABS)Lastna masa (z ABS)158.5 kgLastna masa (z ABS)139 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo11 lProstornina posode za gorivo11 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemA2Skladnost z dovoljenjemA2

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

Na prvih nekaj metrih se mi je za kratek čas zdelo, da je moč nekoliko premajhna. Vendar je po nekaj časa hitro postalo jasno, da moč ni vse in da je vrhunski užitek v vožnji zagotovljen tudi z malo konjskimi močmi. V ZDA obstajajo prometna pravila, imenovana "lane splitting", ki pomenijo premikanje naprej med avtomobili, kadar je zastoj. Pred semaforjem, na primer. Priznati moram, da se tu na začetku nisem počutil tako udobno. Porsche na levi, Dodge na desni, s kolesom res ne želite zavijati. Vendar je krmilo BMW G310R precej ozko in res si lahko brez pomislekov utiraš pot naprej skozi kolone avtomobilov! Edina pomanjkljivost, ki sem jo opazil takoj na začetku, je zavorni pedal. Na žalost je nekoliko oddaljena. Tudi zadnja zavora se je vklapljala nekoliko pozno. Vendar se to vsekakor lahko optimizira z nastavitvijo. Na splošno je to zelo uspešno kolo. Je izjemno vsestransko, res zabavno na vseh področjih in že od prvega trenutka se počutite udobno! Glede na območje vrtljajev, v katerem se nahajate, lahko kolo prilagodite svojemu slogu vožnje. Križarjenje pri nizkih vrtljajih in izjemno športna vožnja pri visokih vrtljajih! Popoln vsestranski roadster po odlični ceni.

Vodljivost

teža

domiselno podvozje

stabilnost

Zavorni pedal

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke je res dober kompromis med športnostjo, razumnostjo, udobjem vožnje, zabavo in ceno. Najboljše od vsega: sploh ni videti, da gre za kompromis, temveč da je pripravljen za dirkanje.

Majhna teža

zadostna moč

visok faktor zabave

nizka poraba

Počasna sklopka

majhna geometrija

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen BMW G 310 R vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a BMW G 310 R 2016 and a KTM 390 Duke 2016. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW G 310 R was published on 10/7/2015 and now has more than 28,500 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 11/12/2012.

Cena BMW G 310 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena KTM 390 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH