KTM 690 Duke R 2013 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 690 Duke R 2013 vs KTM 690 Duke 2016

The KTM 690 Duke R model year 2013 and the KTM 690 Duke model year 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have a single-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine with a displacement of 690cc. The engine power of the 2013 model is 70 HP, while the 2016 model has a slightly higher engine power of 73 HP. Both models have the same torque of 70 Nm and the same number of cylinders.

In terms of suspension, both models have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and WP suspension elements. The chassis of both bikes is made of chromium-molybdenum and has a tubular frame. The front brakes of both models have four pistons and use radial technology, with Brembo being the brand of choice.

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

Both bikes are equipped with advanced rider assistance systems, specifically Ride by Wire. They also have the same front and rear tire dimensions, with a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase and fuel tank capacity are also identical, with a wheelbase of 1466mm and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

The KTM 690 Duke R 2013 has several strengths compared to the 2016 model. It features monobloc brakes, which provide better braking performance. It also comes with an Akrapovic exhaust, which enhances the bike's sound and performance. Additionally, the 2013 model has WP suspension elements, which are known for their high-quality performance. Lastly, the 2013 model has a higher lean angle clearance, making it more suitable for aggressive cornering.

On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 has its own set of strengths. It is described as suitable for everyday use, indicating that it is comfortable and practical for daily commuting. The 2016 model is praised for its smooth running and low vibration, providing a more comfortable riding experience. It also has a highly developed single-cylinder engine, which likely results in improved performance and efficiency. Lastly, the 2016 model is described as versatile, suggesting that it can handle various riding conditions and styles.

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 is criticized for its lack of comfort and weather protection. This indicates that it may not be the most comfortable bike for long rides or in adverse weather conditions. On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 is mentioned to not be sporty enough for the racetrack, suggesting that it may not have the same level of performance and agility as the 2013 model. Additionally, the 2016 model requires an extra cost for the Track Pack, which may be seen as a drawback for some potential buyers.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 and the KTM 690 Duke 2016 have similar technical specifications but differ in their strengths and weaknesses. The 2013 model is praised for its performance-enhancing features such as monobloc brakes and an Akrapovic exhaust, while the 2016 model is described as more suitable for everyday use and offers a smoother and more comfortable riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and intended usage.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 690 Duke R 2013 v primerjavi z KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke R 2013
KTM 690 Duke 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina102 mmIzvrtina102 mm
GibGib84,5 mmGib84,5 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja70 KMMoč motorja73 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči7500 vrt./minŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči7500 vrt./min
NavorNavor70 NmNavor70 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru5500 vrt./minŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru5500 vrt./min
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12,6 Kompresijsko razmerje12,6
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesa
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
VentiliVentiliNihajni vzvod, OHCVentiliNihajni vzvod, OHC
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina690 cm³Gibna prostornina690 cm³

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice
ZnamkaZnamkaWPZnamkaWP

Zadnje vzmetenje

ZnamkaZnamkaWPZnamkaWP

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirKrom-molibden
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaCevast

Sprednje zavore

BatBatŠtirje batiBatŠtirje bati
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljust
TehnologijaTehnologijaRadialnaTehnologijaRadialna
ZnamkaZnamkaBremboZnamkaBrembo

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
BatBatEn batBatEn bat
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljust
ZnamkaZnamkaBremboZnamkaBrembo

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomVodenje po žiciNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomVodenje po žici

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike160 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike160 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike60 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1466 mmMedosna razdalja1466 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža865 mmVišina sedeža835 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo14 lProstornina posode za gorivo14 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

Da je KTM 690 Duke R boljši motocikel, je jasno že ob pogledu na oba stroja od zunaj. Izpušni sistem Akrapovič in elementi vzmetenja WP preprosto delujejo in zvenijo bolje.

Zavore Monobloc

izpušni sistem Akrapovic

elementi vzmetenja WP

večji naklonski kot.

Pomanjkanje udobja

brez vremenske zaščite

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

Glede na to, kje se je družina KTM Duke nekoč začela, je 690 Duke neverjeten korak naprej. Motor je izredno prefinjen in hkrati hrupen za ulični enovaljnik. Kljub vsej vgrajeni tehnologiji je to še vedno zelo lahek motocikel in ga lahko skorajda označimo za igračo (v dobrem smislu). Mnenja deli le njegov položaj sedenja, saj je z modelom Duke 4 iz leta 2012 nekdanji supermoto postal skoraj ukročen goli motocikel s sedežem, usmerjenim na sprednje kolo. Prednost: vsakodnevno življenje in dolge ture na trenutnem Duku ne bi smele predstavljati težav.

zmogljiv motor

primeren za vsakodnevno uporabo

številni tehnični pripomočki

okretnost

gladko delovanje

For some, not a "real" single-cylinder Duke

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 690 Duke R vs KTM 690 Duke

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke R 2013 and a KTM 690 Duke 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke R with 65 days compared to 78 days for a KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke R and 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke since model year 2008. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke R was published on 12/2/2009 and now has more than 23,900 views. This compares to more than 14,800 views for the first review on KTM 690 Duke published on 9/28/2007.

Cena KTM 690 Duke R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena KTM 690 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave