KTM 690 Duke 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2021

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 Duke 2016 vs Yamaha MT-09 2021

When comparing the KTM 690 Duke 2016 and the Yamaha MT-09 2021, there are several notable differences and similarities to consider.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 has 73 HP, while the Yamaha MT-09 2021 has a more powerful engine with 119 HP. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 2021 has a higher top speed and faster acceleration compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2016.

In terms of torque, the Yamaha MT-09 2021 also has an advantage with 93 Nm compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2016's 70 Nm. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 2021 will have better low-end power and acceleration.

Both bikes have liquid cooling and a single swing arm rear suspension. They also have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and a monoshock for the rear suspension. This ensures a smooth and comfortable ride for both bikes.

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

The chassis of the KTM 690 Duke 2016 is made of chromium-molybdenum, while the Yamaha MT-09 2021 has an aluminium frame. The aluminium frame of the Yamaha MT-09 2021 provides better rigidity and stability compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2016's chromium-molybdenum frame.

In terms of brakes, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 has larger front brake discs with a diameter of 320 mm, while the Yamaha MT-09 2021 has slightly smaller front brake discs with a diameter of 298 mm. This means that the KTM 690 Duke 2016 will have better braking performance compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2021.

Both bikes have advanced rider assistance systems, with the KTM 690 Duke 2016 featuring Ride by Wire technology and the Yamaha MT-09 2021 featuring ABS, quickshifter, and traction control. The Yamaha MT-09 2021's electronics package is more comprehensive, offering more advanced features compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2016.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1466 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2021's 1430 mm. The seat height of the KTM 690 Duke 2016 is also slightly higher at 835 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2021's 825 mm. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2021 is heavier with a kerb weight of 189 kg compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2016's 149.5 kg.

Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, providing a decent range for long rides.

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2021

In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 is known for being suitable for everyday use, with a smooth running and low vibration single-cylinder engine. It is also highly versatile, making it a great choice for various riding conditions.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2021 has several strengths including no more load change reactions, even more pressure from the center, and an over-complete electronics package. It also has a great working quickshifter and a comfortably integrated seating position. The Yamaha MT-09 2021 is praised for its successful chassis, lively handling, and enormous riding pleasure.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 does not come with a Track Pack as standard and may not be sporty enough for racetrack enthusiasts. The Yamaha MT-09 2021 has a polarizing look, a small TFT display, and somewhat indirect front wheel feel. Additionally, cruise control is only available in the SP variant of the Yamaha MT-09 2021.

Overall, both the KTM 690 Duke 2016 and the Yamaha MT-09 2021 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2021

KTM 690 Duke 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2021

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina102 mmIzvrtina78 mm
GibGib84.5 mmGib62.1 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja73 KMMoč motorja119 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči7,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči10,000 min-1
NavorNavor70 NmNavor93 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru5,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,000 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje11.5
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri3
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
VentiliVentiliNihajni vzvod, Odmična gred v glavi motorjaVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorja
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina690 cm3Gibna prostornina889 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice
HodHod135 mmHod130 mm

Zadnje vzmetenje

VzmetenjeVzmetenjeVrtljivi drogVzmetenjeVrtljivi drog
AmortizerAmortizerEn blažilnikAmortizerEn blažilnik
HodHod135 mmHod122 mm

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirAluminij
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaDvojna cev
Naklon vilicNaklon vilic63.5 stopinjaNaklon vilic65 stopinja

Sprednje zavore

PremerPremer320 mmPremer298 mm

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
PremerPremer240 mmPremer245 mm

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomVodenje po žiciNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS, Hitra prestavna ročica, Nadzor zdrsavanja koles

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike160 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike180 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,466 mmMedosna razdalja1,430 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža835 mmVišina sedeža825 mm
Lastna masa (z ABS)Lastna masa (z ABS)149.5 kgLastna masa (z ABS)189 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo14 lProstornina posode za gorivo14 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

It is unbelievable how cultivated KTM has developed the single-cylinder without sacrificing performance. It can be considered a stroke of genius that, within the framework of the EURO4 standard, the engine's running culture was raised while at the same time increasing power. The flat torque curve is responsible for the smooth, powerful propulsion. From 4000 revs, the Duke pushes hard and revs up to 8500 revs. Even at low revs, the engine does not stutter or swallow, which is an advantage in the city. The Duke's greatest strength, apart from its rideability, is its manoeuvrability, which is why it can confidently be called a toy. It's only when you're on the racetrack and attacking hard that you wish you had the "R" under your bum.

suitable for everyday use

smooth running

low vibration

highly developed single-cylinder engine

versatile

Track Pack at extra cost

not sporty enough for the racetrack

Yamaha MT-09 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2021

The ingredients for the 2021 update are right: More power, more equipment, more electronics, less weight. If you take a look at the key data of the latest MT-09, including its over-complete standard equipment, "mid-range naked bike" almost sounds a bit pejorative. The Japanese engineers have made improvements exactly where they were needed. The swaying chassis is now a thing of the past and the load change reactions have also been eliminated from the revised three-cylinder engine. The additional power paired with a little more pressure in the mid-range gives a sovereign riding feeling. The MT-09 offers a lot of equipment and enormous riding pleasure at a very attractive price. If you like the look, you can buy it without hesitation.

No more load change reactions

even more pressure from the centre

over-complete electronics package

great working quickshifter

comfortably integrated seating position

successful chassis

lively handling

enormous riding pleasure.

Polarising look

small TFT display

somewhat indirect front wheel feel

cruise control only available in SP variant

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2016 and a Yamaha MT-09 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2021 is about 45% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2021 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 14 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 78 days compared to 112 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons