BMW S 1000 RR 2012 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015
BMW S 1000 RR 2012
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015
Pregled - BMW S 1000 RR 2012 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015
The BMW S 1000 RR model year 2012 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 model year 2015 are both supersport motorcycles that offer powerful performance and advanced technology. However, there are some differences between the two models that make them unique in their own ways.
Starting with the technical specifications, both motorcycles have an in-line engine type with a displacement of 999cc. The BMW S 1000 RR has a slightly larger bore of 80mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000's 74.5mm. The stroke of the BMW is 49.7mm, while the Suzuki has a stroke of 57.3mm. In terms of power, the BMW S 1000 RR boasts 192 horsepower, whereas the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 offers 185 horsepower. The torque figures are also slightly different, with the BMW producing 112 Nm and the Suzuki generating 116.7 Nm. Both motorcycles have a compression ratio of around 13, with the BMW at 13 and the Suzuki at 12.8. Both models feature four cylinders and an aluminum frame.
BMW S 1000 RR 2012
Moving on to the chassis, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a twin-tube frame, while the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015 features a twin-spar frame. Both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front with radial technology. The front and rear tire dimensions are the same for both models, with a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase of the BMW is slightly longer at 1432mm compared to the Suzuki's 1405mm. The seat height of the BMW is higher at 820mm, while the Suzuki has a seat height of 810mm. The kerb weight of the BMW with ABS is 207kg, while the Suzuki weighs slightly less at 205kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a complete electronic equipment package, which includes features such as traction control, ABS, and multiple riding modes. Its braking system is also highly regarded, providing excellent stopping power. The engine of the BMW is known for its strong performance, allowing the motorcycle to be extremely fast on the road. Additionally, the BMW S 1000 RR has an appropriate appearance that appeals to many riders.
On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015 is known for its sophisticated technology, benefiting from the wealth of experience gained from years of successful racing. The model also offers a wide range of accessories, allowing riders to customize their motorcycle to their liking.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015
However, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 does have a weakness in its somewhat complicated chassis, which may take some time for riders to get used to. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015 is criticized for being a somewhat greyed model, meaning it may not be as exciting or up to date compared to newer models in the market. Additionally, some riders feel that the electronics of the Suzuki are no longer up to date.
In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015 offer impressive performance and advanced technology. The BMW excels in terms of its electronic equipment and strong engine, while the Suzuki benefits from its sophisticated technology and racing heritage. However, the BMW has a more complicated chassis, and the Suzuki may not be as visually appealing or have the latest electronics. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the preferences and priorities of the individual rider.
Tehnične specifikacije BMW S 1000 RR 2012 v primerjavi z Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
BMW S 1000 RR 2012
BMW lahko leta 2015 še vedno pridobi točke s trdnimi dejstvi. Če vam je všeč vrhunska zmogljivost, morate kupiti BMW. Na vrhu se izkaže za neverjetno zmogljivega in od 200 odpelje preostali del polja. Veliki in težki vozniki bodo od tega lahko imeli še več koristi. BMW si s tem motociklom ni olajšal dela in je sestavil zelo univerzalen motocikel. Če bi naredili primerjalni test s 50 različnimi vozniki (od novincev do profesionalcev), bi imel BMW najboljše povprečje med vsemi 1000-kubičnimi motocikli. Zaradi elektronskega podvozja in tudi pripomočkov za vožnjo so profesionalci na cesti hitri, začetniki pa varni. Vrhunsko priporočilo za zelo široko ciljno skupino. Zelo hitri hobi vozniki ne bodo 100-odstotno zadovoljni s standardnim vzmetenjem. Če ne želite spreminjati podvozja, raje izberite model R1M, Panigale S ali RSV RF. Če želite vseeno predelati, je S 1000 RR najmočnejša in najbolj univerzalna osnova. Presenetljivo je, da se zmogljiv stroj zelo dobro pelje tudi po podeželskih cestah. Vse skupaj je videti kot kompromis, vendar se v praksi nikoli ne počuti kot kompromis.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015
Zaradi številnih zmagovitih let na mednarodnih motociklističnih dirkah je superbike GSX-R1000 postal legenda - in nekoliko siv model. Pravih inovacij ali celo revolucij že dolgo ni več, zadnje posodobitve pa so bile omejene na vizualne nadgradnje, kot je barvna shema MotoGP Replica. Morda je videti svež in hiter, vendar je v segmentu dirkalnikov, ki so zdaj napredovali do tehnološko naprednih in ustrezno dragih hiperšportnih motociklov, GSX-R zdaj videti kot nekoliko siv prototip. Še vedno vozi dobro, hitro in harmonično, le da se vidi, da je zrel - in to je mišljeno v pozitivnem smislu. Kljub temu že čakamo na naslednjo generacijo.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen BMW S 1000 RR vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2012 and a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2015. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 64 days compared to 83 days for a Suzuki GSX-R 1000. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 4/16/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 7,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-R 1000 published on 3/3/2004.
