Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs. BMW K 1300 R 2009
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW K 1300 R 2009
Pregled - Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs BMW K 1300 R 2009
The Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the BMW K 1300 R 2009 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and front and rear suspension setups. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 takes the lead with 173 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016's 140 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 140 Nm compared to the Triumph's 112 Nm. This means that the BMW offers more power and torque, which can result in a more thrilling and exhilarating riding experience.
In terms of displacement, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a larger engine with a displacement of 1293 ccm, while the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a displacement of 1050 ccm. This means that the BMW has a larger engine capacity, which can contribute to its higher power and torque output.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front, ensuring good braking performance and control. They also have the same front and rear tire diameters of 17 inches, providing stability and grip on the road.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a longer wheelbase of 1585 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016's 1435 mm. This longer wheelbase can contribute to better stability and handling at higher speeds. However, the Triumph has a slightly lower seat height of 825 mm compared to the BMW's 820 mm, which may be more comfortable for shorter riders.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a larger tank with a capacity of 19 liters, while the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a smaller tank with a capacity of 15.5 liters. This means that the BMW can potentially offer a longer riding range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a distinctive three-cylinder engine with a unique sound, along with a distinctive look and good brakes. It also offers a sporty seating position and a well-functioning electronics package.
BMW K 1300 R 2009
On the other hand, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a sharp and attractive design, plenty of power, and a comfortable and relaxed ride. It also features an optimized system with ABS, RDC, EVO, ASC, and ESA 2, which can enhance safety and performance.
However, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 does have some weaknesses. The engine could be more responsive at the bottom end, and the handling can feel somewhat sluggish. On the other hand, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 may have a curve settling-in period at the beginning, which can affect the bike's initial performance.
In conclusion, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 offers more power, torque, and a larger fuel tank capacity compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016. It also features an optimized system with advanced safety and performance features. However, the Triumph has a distinctive engine sound, a unique look, and a well-functioning electronics package. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehnične specifikacije Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 v primerjavi z BMW K 1300 R 2009
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Speed Triple tudi v najnovejši generaciji ostaja zvest svoji liniji - čudovito oster goli motocikel, ki je značilen za slog uličnega bojevnika kot skoraj noben drug model. Za dirkališče ima le omejen smisel - seveda je rjoveči trivaljni motor s 140 KM izjemno zabaven in Fafhrwerk ne kaže nobenih grobih slabosti, vendar je na voljo Speed Triple R z elementi vzmetenja Öhlins, ki se na dirkališču seveda počuti bolj domače. V celoti gledano je Speed Triple S odličen borec za podeželske ceste, ki ima veliko za ponuditi tudi na področju videza.
BMW K 1300 R 2009
Ročica za plin je odprta, K se pomakne naprej in ko na drugih motornih kolesih naredite kratek premor, preprosto ostanete na ročici za plin in z okrepljenim K prestavite v naslednjo prestavo. Pravi biser za zahtevne dirke.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Triumph Speed Triple S vs BMW K 1300 R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and a BMW K 1300 R 2009. It takes less time to sell a BMW K 1300 R with 81 days compared to 93 days for the Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S and 7 reviews for the BMW K 1300 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple S was published on 10/23/2011 and now has more than 10,300 views. This compares to more than 20,400 views for the first review on BMW K 1300 R published on 10/9/2008.
