KTM 690 Duke R 2015 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2015

KTM 690 Duke R 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 690 Duke R 2015 vs KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 690 Duke R 2015 and the KTM 390 Duke 2013 are both naked bikes from KTM, but they have several differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 690 Duke R 2015 has a significant advantage with 70 HP compared to the KTM 390 Duke 2013's 44 HP. This means that the 690 Duke R has more power and is better suited for high-speed riding and more aggressive riding styles. The 390 Duke, on the other hand, has sufficient power for everyday commuting and is more fuel-efficient.

Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and a displacement of 375ccm for the 390 Duke and 690ccm for the 690 Duke R. This means that the 690 Duke R has a larger engine and can deliver more power and torque, with 70 Nm compared to the 390 Duke's 35 Nm.

KTM 690 Duke R 2015

KTM 690 Duke R 2015

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks from WP, ensuring good handling and stability. The 690 Duke R has an advantage in terms of chassis, as it features a chromium-molybdenum frame, which is known for its strength and lightweight characteristics. The 390 Duke also has a chromium-molybdenum frame, providing good stability and durability.

Both bikes have four-piston radial brakes at the front, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power. The 690 Duke R has the advantage of adjustable chassis, allowing riders to fine-tune the suspension to their preferences and riding style. The 390 Duke does not have this feature, which may limit its adjustability and customization options.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the 690 Duke R has a wider front tire (120mm) compared to the 390 Duke's 110mm. The 690 Duke R also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 14 liters compared to the 390 Duke's 11 liters. The wheelbase of the 690 Duke R is longer at 1466mm, providing better stability at higher speeds, while the 390 Duke has a shorter wheelbase of 1367mm, making it more nimble and maneuverable.

One of the strengths of the 690 Duke R is its top equipment and racing geometry, which makes it suitable for more aggressive riding styles and track use. It also has a higher lean angle clearance, allowing riders to take corners at higher speeds. The 690 Duke R also has strong brakes and an adjustable chassis, giving riders more control and customization options.

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

On the other hand, the 390 Duke's strengths lie in its light weight and sufficient power for everyday commuting. It also has a lower fuel consumption, making it more economical to ride. However, it lacks the chassis adjustment options of the 690 Duke R and may not offer the same level of comfort for longer rides.

In terms of weaknesses, the 690 Duke R may be more uncomfortable in everyday life due to its racing geometry and high seat height of 865mm. The 390 Duke, on the other hand, does not have chassis adjustment options and may have lower comfort levels compared to the 690 Duke R.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke R 2015 and the KTM 390 Duke 2013 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The 690 Duke R offers top equipment, racing geometry, strong brakes, and an adjustable chassis, making it suitable for more aggressive riding styles and track use. The 390 Duke, on the other hand, is lighter, more fuel-efficient, and sufficient for everyday commuting. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 690 Duke R 2015 v primerjavi z KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2015
KTM 390 Duke 2013

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina102 mmIzvrtina89 mm
GibGib84.5 mmGib60 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja70 KMMoč motorja44 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči7,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1
NavorNavor70 NmNavor35 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru5,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,250 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje12.6
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina690 cm3Gibna prostornina375 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice
ZnamkaZnamkaWPZnamkaWP

Zadnje vzmetenje

ZnamkaZnamkaWPZnamkaWP

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirKrom-molibden
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaCevast

Sprednje zavore

BatBatŠtirje batiBatŠtirje bati
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljust
TehnologijaTehnologijaRadialnaTehnologijaRadialna

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
BatBatEn batBatEn bat
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaGibljiva čeljust

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomVodenje po žiciNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike160 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike60 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,466 mmMedosna razdalja1,367 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža865 mmVišina sedeža800 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo14 lProstornina posode za gorivo11 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA2

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 690 Duke R 2015

KTM 690 Duke R 2015

R se začne tam, kjer se standardni Duke konča ali doseže svoje meje. Na cesti bo razlika opazna le v dvoboju na domači stezi, na dirkališču pa postane še posebej očitna. Pri tem so odločilni dejavniki zavore, nastavljivo podvozje in odmik od nagibnega kota. Zaradi 30 mm višjega sedeža se samodejno postavite v dirkaški položaj s prednjim kolesom, dobite več povratnih informacij od podvozja in bolj pritiskate na zavore. Model "R" ima že vgrajeno vse, kar lahko dobite le v standardni različici s paketom Track Pack - in še več. In sicer fino vzmetenje in izpušni sistem Akrapovič. V zameno za to morate pri vsakodnevni uporabi nekoliko popustiti pri udobju.

Vrhunska oprema

dirkaška geometrija

prostor za nagibanje

močne zavore

nastavljivo podvozje

Bolj neprijetno v vsakdanjem življenju

visok sedež

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 390 Duke celebrates the lightness of being.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 690 Duke R vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke R 2015 and a KTM 390 Duke 2013. It takes less time to sell a KTM 390 Duke with 43 days compared to 99 days for the KTM 690 Duke R. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke R and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke R was published on 12/2/2009 and now has more than 23,900 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 11/12/2012.

Cena KTM 690 Duke R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena KTM 390 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH