Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-10 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Yamaha MT-10 2017

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Yamaha MT-10 2017 are both powerful naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations, and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 takes the lead with 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011's 132 HP. The Yamaha also has a slightly higher torque at 111 Nm compared to the Triumph's 110 Nm. This means that the Yamaha offers more raw power and acceleration, making it more suitable for riders who enjoy high-speed performance.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, which provide excellent handling and stability. The chassis of the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame, while the Yamaha MT-10 2017 has an aluminum frame with a Deltabox design. The Deltabox frame offers superior rigidity and balance, enhancing the overall handling and maneuverability of the Yamaha.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Triumph has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1437 mm compared to the Yamaha's 1400 mm. However, the seat height of the Yamaha is slightly lower at 825 mm compared to the Triumph's 828 mm. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters, providing a decent range for long rides.

When it comes to strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 is known for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 offers a great sound, pleasant wind protection, comfortable seating position even on long tours, great engine response, and a balanced overall package despite its radical looks and wicked sound.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has been noted to have rough gearing at times, which can disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine. The Yamaha MT-10 2017, on the other hand, has a seating position that may feel too inactive on the racetrack. Additionally, while the Yamaha's chassis and ride assistance systems are sufficient for trackdays, they may not be on the same level as other Powernakeds.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Yamaha MT-10 2017 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers more power and a more balanced overall package, while the Triumph provides a controlled chassis and a hard sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Yamaha MT-10 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Yamaha MT-10 2017

Motor in pogonski sklop

Vrsta motorjaVrsta motorjaVrstniVrsta motorjaVrstni
IzvrtinaIzvrtina79 mmIzvrtina79 mm
GibGib71.4 mmGib50.9 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja132 KMMoč motorja160 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,250 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči11,500 min-1
NavorNavor110 NmNavor111 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru9,000 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12 Kompresijsko razmerje12
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Število prestavŠtevilo prestav6Število prestav6
CilindriCilindri3Cilindri4
Ventili na valjVentili na valj4Ventili na valj4
VentiliVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorjaVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorja
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina1,050 cm3Gibna prostornina998 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirAluminij
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaDvojna cevTip okvirjaDeltabox

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike55 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
DolžinaDolžina2,086 mmDolžina2,095 mm
ŠirinaŠirina728 mmŠirina800 mm
VišinaVišina1,120 mmVišina1,110 mm
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,437 mmMedosna razdalja1,400 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža828 mmVišina sedeža825 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo17.5 lProstornina posode za gorivo17 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 z odličnim motorjem CP4 izžareva veliko čustev, vendar ne pozablja tudi na pragmatično uporabnost. Za golo motorno kolo ponuja veliko udobja na dolgih poteh. Vozi hitro, vendar je ves čas prefinjen. Na dirkališču podvozje ni dovolj natančno, da bi premagalo druge Powernakede. Na splošno pa je prepričal s svojo vsestranskostjo v kombinaciji z radikalnim videzom in odličnim zvokom.

odličen zvok

prijetna zaščita pred vetrom

udobno sedenje tudi na dolgih poteh

odlična odzivnost motorja

uravnotežen celoten paket kljub radikalnemu videzu in hudemu zvoku

Preveč nedejaven položaj sedenja na dirkališču

podvozje in sistemi za pomoč pri vožnji zadostujejo za dirkališča, vendar niso na enaki ravni kot drugi Powernakedi.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Yamaha MT-10

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Yamaha MT-10 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2017 is about 60% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,000 USD and 1,680 USD for a Yamaha MT-10 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 2017 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 12. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 143 days for a Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 since model year 2016. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 20,700 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 published on 11/17/2015.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH