Yamaha MT-10 2017 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Loading...

Pregled - Yamaha MT-10 2017 vs Yamaha XSR900 2016

The Yamaha MT-10 2017 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both naked bikes from Yamaha, but they have some key differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 is equipped with a more powerful engine compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016. The MT-10 has an inline 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 998cc, producing 160 horsepower and 111 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the XSR900 has an inline 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847cc, producing 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. This makes the MT-10 more powerful and provides better acceleration.

Both bikes have similar suspension setups, with upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, but the MT-10 has a Deltabox frame while the XSR900 has a Twin Tube frame. The Deltabox frame on the MT-10 is known for its rigidity and stability, providing better handling and control.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disc brakes in the front, but the MT-10 has larger 320mm diameter discs compared to the 298mm discs on the XSR900. This gives the MT-10 better stopping power and improved braking performance.

Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. However, the XSR900 only has ABS as standard, while the MT-10 has both ABS and traction control as standard. This gives the MT-10 an advantage in terms of safety and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the 1400mm wheelbase of the MT-10. The seat height of the XSR900 is also slightly lower at 815mm compared to the 825mm seat height of the MT-10. The XSR900 is slightly lighter with a kerb weight of 191kg compared to the 210kg kerb weight of the MT-10. However, the MT-10 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters compared to the 14 liters of the XSR900.

Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the MT-10 is praised for its great sound, pleasant wind protection, and comfortable seating position even on long tours. It also has a great engine response and is considered a balanced overall package despite its radical looks and wicked sound.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

On the other hand, the XSR900 is known for its greedy engine and well-tuned riding modes. It comes with ABS and traction control as standard, which is a plus for safety. The XSR900 also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The MT-10 has a seating position that is too inactive on the racetrack, and its chassis and ride assistance systems are not on the same level as other Powernakeds. The XSR900 has a hard chassis and the seat could be more comfortable. Additionally, the speedblock design of the XSR900 is already seen on many other Yamaha models, which may be seen as a drawback for some.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both impressive naked bikes from Yamaha. The MT-10 offers more power and better overall performance, while the XSR900 has a unique design and comes with ABS and traction control as standard. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use.

Tehnične specifikacije Yamaha MT-10 2017 v primerjavi z Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

Vrsta motorjaVrsta motorjaVrstniVrsta motorjaVrstni
IzvrtinaIzvrtina79 mmIzvrtina78 mm
GibGib50.9 mmGib59.1 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja160 KMMoč motorja115 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči11,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči10,000 min-1
NavorNavor111 NmNavor87.5 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru9,000 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru8,500 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12 Kompresijsko razmerje11.5
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
VžigVžigTranzistorVžigTranzistor
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
Vrsta menjalnikaVrsta menjalnikaPrestavna ročicaVrsta menjalnikaPrestavna ročica
Število prestavŠtevilo prestav6Število prestav6
CilindriCilindri4Cilindri3
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Ventili na valjVentili na valj4Ventili na valj4
VentiliVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorjaVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorja
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina998 cm3Gibna prostornina847 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice
HodHod120 mmHod137 mm

Zadnje vzmetenje

VzmetenjeVzmetenjeVrtljivi drogVzmetenjeVrtljivi drog
AmortizerAmortizerEn blažilnikAmortizerEn blažilnik
HodHod120 mmHod130 mm

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirAluminij
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaDeltaboxTip okvirjaDvojna cev
Naklon vilicNaklon vilic66 stopinjaNaklon vilic65 stopinja
PredtekPredtek102 mmPredtek103 mm

Sprednje zavore

VrstaVrstaDvojni kolutVrstaDvojni kolut
PremerPremer320 mmPremer298 mm

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
PremerPremer220 mmPremer245 mm

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS, Nadzor zdrsavanja kolesNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike180 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike55 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
DolžinaDolžina2,095 mmDolžina2,075 mm
ŠirinaŠirina800 mmŠirina815 mm
VišinaVišina1,110 mmVišina1,135 mm
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,400 mmMedosna razdalja1,440 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža825 mmVišina sedeža815 mm
Lastna masa (z ABS)Lastna masa (z ABS)210 kgLastna masa (z ABS)191 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo17 lProstornina posode za gorivo14 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 z odličnim motorjem CP4 izžareva veliko čustev, vendar ne pozablja tudi na pragmatično uporabnost. Za golo motorno kolo ponuja veliko udobja na dolgih poteh. Vozi hitro, vendar je ves čas prefinjen. Na dirkališču podvozje ni dovolj natančno, da bi premagalo druge Powernakede. Na splošno pa je prepričal s svojo vsestranskostjo v kombinaciji z radikalnim videzom in odličnim zvokom.

odličen zvok

prijetna zaščita pred vetrom

udobno sedenje tudi na dolgih poteh

odlična odzivnost motorja

uravnotežen celoten paket kljub radikalnemu videzu in hudemu zvoku

Preveč nedejaven položaj sedenja na dirkališču

podvozje in sistemi za pomoč pri vožnji zadostujejo za dirkališča, vendar niso na enaki ravni kot drugi Powernakedi.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Yamaha MT-10 vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 2017 and a Yamaha XSR900 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2017 is about 54% higher. A Yamaha MT-10 2017 experiences a loss of 1,000 USD in one year and 1,680 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,650 USD and 1,670 USD for a Yamaha XSR900 2016. Compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016 there are more Yamaha MT-10 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 143 days for the Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 was published on 11/17/2015 and now has more than 20,700 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 11/25/2015.

Cena Yamaha MT-10

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Yamaha XSR900

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH