Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs. Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010
Pregled - Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010
The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 model year 2005 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade model year 2010 are both powerful supersport motorcycles with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have a 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999cc and produce 178 horsepower. They also have similar dimensions and weights, with the Suzuki having a wheelbase of 1405mm, seat height of 810mm, and fuel tank capacity of 18 liters, while the Honda has a wheelbase of 1410mm, seat height of 820mm, and fuel tank capacity of 17.7 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 has a slim appearance which gives it a sleek and aerodynamic look. It also has increased cam lift which improves its performance and gives it a more aggressive feel. The bike is equipped with an anti-hopping clutch, which helps to prevent rear wheel lock-up during aggressive downshifting. The brakes on the GSX-R 1000 are highly effective, providing strong stopping power. Additionally, the bike has excellent handling, allowing riders to confidently navigate corners and curves.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
On the other hand, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010 is known for its easy operation. The bike is user-friendly and can be easily maneuvered, making it suitable for riders of different skill levels. The CBR1000RR also offers positive handling, giving riders a sense of control and stability. The motor on the Honda is strong and delivers lots of power, allowing for thrilling acceleration and top speed.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 is not an oversized motorbike, which may be a drawback for riders who prefer larger bikes. The seat height on the Suzuki is set a little too low for some riders, which may cause discomfort during long rides.
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010
Similarly, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010 has some weaknesses. Some riders feel that the bike lacks a feeling for the rear wheel, which can affect their confidence and control. The traction on the CBR1000RR is also considered suboptimal by some riders, which may affect its performance in certain conditions. Additionally, the geometry of the bike could be improved to enhance its handling and stability.
In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010 are powerful supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a slim appearance, improved performance, and excellent handling, while the Honda provides easy operation, positive handling, and a strong motor. However, the Suzuki may not be suitable for riders looking for an oversized bike, and the Honda may lack a feeling for the rear wheel and have suboptimal traction.
Tehnične specifikacije Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 v primerjavi z Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Če povzamemo: "Popolnoma neverjetna škatla, ki bi lahko bila dejansko vredna 15.599 evrov!" Izdelava je dobra, zmogljivost je visoka, vozna izkušnja pa zelo dobra.
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010
Especially in terms of weight, the current CBR1000RR (without C-ABS) is a cut above almost all its competitors. It is an all-rounder, which can be both an advantage and a disadvantage.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Suzuki GSX-R 1000 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2010. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 with 47 days compared to 65 days for a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 and 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 was published on 3/3/2004 and now has more than 7,100 views. This compares to more than 3,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade published on 11/25/2003.
