Husqvarna FE 350 2016 vs. Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Loading...

Pregled - Husqvarna FE 350 2016 vs Husqvarna FC 250 2016

The Husqvarna FE 350 2016 and the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 are both powerful and capable motorcycles, but they have some key differences.

In terms of engine specifications, the FE 350 has a larger bore of 88 mm compared to the FC 250's 78 mm. This means that the FE 350 has a larger piston diameter, which allows for more power and torque. The FE 350 also has a longer stroke of 57.5 mm compared to the FC 250's 52.3 mm, which further enhances its power output. Additionally, the FE 350 has a compression ratio of 12.3, while the FC 250 has a higher compression ratio of 13.9. This means that the FC 250 can generate more power and efficiency from the same amount of fuel.

In terms of starting mechanism, the FE 350 has a kick starter, while the FC 250 has an electric starter. This means that starting the FC 250 is easier and more convenient, as it does not require physical effort to kickstart the engine.

Both motorcycles have a chain transmission system, which is common in off-road bikes. This type of transmission provides efficient power transfer to the rear wheel.

Both the FE 350 and the FC 250 have a single-cylinder, four-stroke engine configuration. This configuration is known for its smooth power delivery and good fuel efficiency.

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and WP shock mounts at the rear. This ensures excellent handling and stability on various terrains.

The chassis of both motorcycles is made of steel and has a central tube frame type. This provides a strong and rigid structure, which is essential for off-road riding.

In terms of tire dimensions, the FE 350 has a wider front tire width of 90 mm compared to the FC 250's 80 mm. The FE 350 also has a larger rear tire width of 140 mm compared to the FC 250's 100 mm. This means that the FE 350 has better traction and stability, especially in challenging off-road conditions.

The wheelbase of the FE 350 is slightly shorter at 1482 mm compared to the FC 250's 1495 mm. However, this difference is minimal and is unlikely to have a significant impact on the overall handling and performance of the motorcycles.

The seat height of the FE 350 is 970 mm, while the FC 250 has a slightly higher seat height of 992 mm. This means that the FC 250 may be more suitable for taller riders, as it provides a slightly higher riding position.

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

In terms of weight, the FE 350 has a dry weight of 109.2 kg, while the FC 250 is slightly lighter at 104.1 kg. This means that the FC 250 may be slightly more agile and easier to handle, especially in tight and technical sections.

The fuel tank capacity of the FE 350 is 9.5 liters, while the FC 250 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 7.5 liters. This means that the FE 350 has a longer range and requires fewer fuel stops during longer rides.

In terms of strengths, the FE 350 is known for being one of the fastest motorcycles on any special stage. It offers a great balance between easy handling and good performance. On the other hand, the FC 250 is a versatile motocross bike with all-around strengths.

In terms of weaknesses, the FE 350 is more aggressive than the FE 250, which means it can be more energy-consuming. The FC 250, on the other hand, is reserved for factory teams only and can be quite expensive.

Overall, the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 and the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 are both high-performance motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The FE 350 offers more power and torque, while the FC 250 is a versatile motocross bike. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.

Tehnične specifikacije Husqvarna FE 350 2016 v primerjavi z Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina88 mmIzvrtina78 mm
GibGib57.5 mmGib52.3 mm
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.3 Kompresijsko razmerje13.9
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikSunekZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina349.7 cm3Gibna prostornina249.9 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice
ZnamkaZnamkaWPZnamkaWP

Zadnje vzmetenje

Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaMehanizem vzmetenjaPritrditev amortizerjaMehanizem vzmetenja
ZnamkaZnamkaWPZnamkaWP

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirJekloOkvirJeklo
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaOsrednja cevTip okvirjaOsrednja cev

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike90 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike80 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike90 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike100 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike21 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike21 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike140 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike100 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike80 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike90 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike18 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike19 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,482 mmMedosna razdalja1,495 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža970 mmVišina sedeža992 mm
Suha masaSuha masa109.2 kgSuha masa104.1 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo9.5 lProstornina posode za gorivo7.5 l

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Huskyjevo univerzalno kolo zmore praktično vse. Kot nekaj vmesnega med modeloma 250 in 450 združuje prednosti obeh modelov. V letu 2017 je postal tudi nekoliko močnejši in je zdaj po odzivnosti bolj primerljiv z modelom 450.

Verjetno najhitrejši stroj na vseh posebnih prizoriščih

odlično razmerje med enostavnim upravljanjem in dobrimi zmogljivostmi.

Očitno bolj agresiven kot FE250 in zato tudi bolj potraten.

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Husqvarna FC 250 2016

Ker bodo te motokrosiste vozili le tovarniški vozniki in izbrani novinarji, je nesmiselno pisati zaključke. V bistvu govorimo o najboljših in najhitrejših motornih kolesih v terenskem prometu. Vsak del je ročno izbran, dobavljajo in obdelujejo ga najboljša podjetja. Vozniki lahko svoja vozila 100-odstotno prilagodijo svojim potrebam in trenutni progi. S tega vidika tu ne morete več govoriti o kakršnih koli slabostih.

vse

Rezervirano samo za tovarniška moštva

drago.

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Husqvarna FE 350 vs Husqvarna FC 250

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FE 350 2016 and a Husqvarna FC 250 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 44 days for the Husqvarna FE 350. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 350 and 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna FE 350 was published on 7/14/2016 and now has more than 91,700 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 250 published on 11/3/2013.

Cena Husqvarna FE 350

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Husqvarna FC 250

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH