Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2013
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Pregled - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs KTM 690 Duke 2013
The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine power and torque. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a higher output with 106 HP compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2013's 68 HP. This gives the Triumph a significant advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. Additionally, the Triumph has three cylinders compared to the KTM's single cylinder, which provides smoother power delivery and a more refined riding experience.
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperature during long rides or in hot weather conditions. This ensures that the engine performs at its best and reduces the risk of overheating.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 features Kayaba suspension, while the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has WP suspension. Both brands are reputable and known for their quality and performance. The rear suspension on both bikes is also provided by the same brands.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
When it comes to the chassis, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a Twin Tube frame type, while the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a Tubular frame type. The Twin Tube frame on the Triumph offers better stability and handling, making it more suitable for aggressive riding and cornering. On the other hand, the Tubular frame on the KTM provides a lightweight and nimble feel, making it ideal for urban commuting and maneuvering through traffic.
In terms of braking performance, both bikes have four-piston front calipers with radial technology. However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 features Nissin brakes, while the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has Brembo brakes. Both brands are renowned for their high-quality braking systems, providing excellent stopping power and control.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Triumph has a slightly narrower front tire width of 120mm compared to the KTM's 160mm. The Triumph also has a shorter wheelbase of 1410mm compared to the KTM's 1466mm. These differences contribute to the Triumph's agility and nimbleness, making it more suitable for tight turns and quick maneuvers.
KTM 690 Duke 2013
When it comes to seat height, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a higher seat height of 835mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013's 800mm. This may be a disadvantage for shorter riders who may struggle to reach the ground comfortably.
In terms of weight, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 is significantly lighter with a kerb weight of 149.5kg compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013's 183kg. This makes the KTM more maneuverable and easier to handle, especially in urban environments.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a larger capacity of 17.4 liters compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2013's 14 liters. This gives the Triumph a longer range and reduces the frequency of refueling stops.
In summary, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 offers a more powerful and refined riding experience with its higher engine output and additional cylinder. It also has a taut and playful chassis, making it agile and responsive. However, it may have a slightly harsh brake application towards the end. On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 is lighter and more fuel-efficient, making it suitable for urban commuting. However, it lacks chassis adjustment options and may have lower comfort levels compared to the Triumph. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.
Tehnične specifikacije Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 v primerjavi z KTM 690 Duke 2013
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.
KTM 690 Duke 2013
For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs KTM 690 Duke
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and a KTM 690 Duke 2013. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 52 days compared to 60 days for a KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke since model year 2008. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 7/20/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 14,800 views for the first review on KTM 690 Duke published on 9/28/2007.
