KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs. BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs BMW G 310 R 2016

The KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 are both naked bikes, but they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a more powerful engine with 44 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2016's 34 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque of 35 Nm compared to the BMW's 28 Nm. Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and a similar displacement, with the KTM at 375 ccm and the BMW at 313 ccm.

Both bikes have upside-down telescopic fork front suspensions and tubular frames. However, the KTM has a chromium-molybdenum frame while the BMW has a steel frame. This could potentially affect the weight and handling of the bikes, with the BMW potentially being lighter and having better handling due to its ingenious chassis.

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

In terms of brakes, both bikes have single disk front brakes and advanced rider assistance systems with ABS. However, the KTM does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could be a drawback for riders who prefer to customize their bike's suspension.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The KTM has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1367 mm compared to the BMW's 1374 mm. The seat height of the KTM is also slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the BMW's 785 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has the advantage of being lightweight, which could make it more agile and easier to handle. It also has sufficient power and a low consumption rate, which could be appealing to riders who want a balance between performance and fuel efficiency.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2016 is praised for its handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. These characteristics could make it a more enjoyable and stable ride, especially for riders who prioritize these aspects.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could limit customization and comfort for some riders. The BMW G 310 R 2016 has a weakness in its brake pedal, although the specific details of this weakness are not provided.

Overall, both the KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers more power and a lightweight design, while the BMW offers better handling and stability. Riders should consider their own preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 390 Duke 2013 v primerjavi z BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013
BMW G 310 R 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina89 mmIzvrtina80 mm
GibGib60 mmGib62 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja44 KMMoč motorja34 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1
NavorNavor35 NmNavor28 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,250 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,500 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje10.6
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina375 cm3Gibna prostornina313 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Zadnje vzmetenje

Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaneposredniPritrditev amortizerjaneposredni

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirJeklo
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaCevast

Sprednje zavore

VrstaVrstaEnojni kolutVrstaEnojni kolut

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABSNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike60 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,367 mmMedosna razdalja1,374 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža800 mmVišina sedeža785 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo11 lProstornina posode za gorivo11 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemA2Skladnost z dovoljenjemA2

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 390 Duke celebrates the lightness of being.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

Na prvih nekaj metrih se mi je za kratek čas zdelo, da je moč nekoliko premajhna. Vendar je po nekaj časa hitro postalo jasno, da moč ni vse in da je vrhunski užitek v vožnji zagotovljen tudi z malo konjskimi močmi. V ZDA obstajajo prometna pravila, imenovana "lane splitting", ki pomenijo premikanje naprej med avtomobili, kadar je zastoj. Pred semaforjem, na primer. Priznati moram, da se tu na začetku nisem počutil tako udobno. Porsche na levi, Dodge na desni, s kolesom res ne želite zavijati. Vendar je krmilo BMW G310R precej ozko in res si lahko brez pomislekov utiraš pot naprej skozi kolone avtomobilov! Edina pomanjkljivost, ki sem jo opazil takoj na začetku, je zavorni pedal. Na žalost je nekoliko oddaljena. Tudi zadnja zavora se je vklapljala nekoliko pozno. Vendar se to vsekakor lahko optimizira z nastavitvijo. Na splošno je to zelo uspešno kolo. Je izjemno vsestransko, res zabavno na vseh področjih in že od prvega trenutka se počutite udobno! Glede na območje vrtljajev, v katerem se nahajate, lahko kolo prilagodite svojemu slogu vožnje. Križarjenje pri nizkih vrtljajih in izjemno športna vožnja pri visokih vrtljajih! Popoln vsestranski roadster po odlični ceni.

Vodljivost

teža

domiselno podvozje

stabilnost

Zavorni pedal

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2013 and a BMW G 310 R 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.

Cena KTM 390 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena BMW G 310 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH