BMW F 800 R 2015 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

The BMW F 800 R 2015 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are both naked bikes from BMW, but they have some notable differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the BMW F 800 R 2015 has a power output of 90 HP, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 boasts a more powerful engine with 160 HP. This means that the S 1000 R has significantly more power and acceleration capabilities compared to the F 800 R.

Similarly, the torque of the BMW S 1000 R is higher at 112 Nm compared to the F 800 R's torque of 86 Nm. This means that the S 1000 R will have better low-end power and acceleration.

The number of cylinders also differs between the two models, with the F 800 R having 2 cylinders and the S 1000 R having 4 cylinders. The increased number of cylinders in the S 1000 R contributes to its higher power output and torque.

In terms of displacement, the BMW S 1000 R has a larger engine with a displacement of 999 ccm, while the F 800 R has a smaller displacement of 798 ccm. This means that the S 1000 R will have a higher top speed and overall performance compared to the F 800 R.

BMW F 800 R 2015

Both models feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and a swing arm for the rear suspension. This ensures a smooth and comfortable ride for both bikes.

In terms of the chassis, both models have an aluminum frame. However, the F 800 R has a twin-tube, load-bearing engine frame type, while the S 1000 R has a twin-tube frame type. This difference in frame type may result in slight variations in handling and stability.

Both models have double disk brakes with four pistons and radial technology for the front brakes. This ensures powerful and responsive braking capabilities for both bikes.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the F 800 R has suspension that is electronically adjustable, while the S 1000 R has dynamic suspension. This means that the S 1000 R may have more advanced and customizable suspension settings for different riding conditions.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of dimensions and weights, the F 800 R has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, while the S 1000 R has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm. The S 1000 R also has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the F 800 R's wheelbase of 1520 mm. The seat height of the S 1000 R is higher at 814 mm compared to the F 800 R's seat height of 790-820 mm. Additionally, the S 1000 R has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the F 800 R's fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.

In terms of strengths, the F 800 R is praised for its high-quality equipment such as ESA, RDC, and ASC, making it a versatile and comfortable bike to ride. It is also fast and comfortable, making it suitable for various riding conditions.

On the other hand, the S 1000 R is commended for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. These features make it a high-performance bike that is also comfortable for long rides.

In terms of weaknesses, the F 800 R becomes relatively high-priced when adding all the optional extras. Additionally, while it performs well on paper and during rides, it lacks the certain "cult" status of other popular naked bikes like the Monster or Street Triple.

The S 1000 R, on the other hand, has expensive optional extras that can be irresistible but also add to the overall cost of the bike. Additionally, some riders may find the chassis to be on the harder side, which may affect comfort during longer rides.