Honda CBF 600 S 2010 vs. Honda CB500F 2013

The Honda CBF 600 S model year 2010 and the Honda CB500F model year 2013 are both naked bikes from Honda, but they have some notable differences in terms of specifications and features.

Starting with the engine and drivetrain, both bikes have an inline engine configuration and liquid cooling. However, the Honda CBF 600 S has a larger displacement of 599.3cc compared to the Honda CB500F's 471cc. This results in a higher power output for the CBF 600 S with 78 horsepower, while the CB500F produces 48 horsepower. In terms of torque, the CBF 600 S also has a higher value with 59 Nm compared to the CB500F's 43 Nm.

Moving on to the chassis, the CBF 600 S features an aluminum frame, which is known for its lightweight and rigid characteristics. On the other hand, the CB500F has a steel frame, which may not be as light but still provides acceptable stability and durability.

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

When it comes to braking, the CBF 600 S is equipped with dual disc brakes at the front, while the CB500F has a single disc brake. Both bikes have dual-piston calipers for efficient braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the CBF 600 S has a wider front tire at 120mm compared to the CB500F's 120mm. The rear tires have the same width at 160mm. Both bikes have a 17-inch wheel diameter for both front and rear tires. The CBF 600 S has a longer wheelbase at 1490mm compared to the CB500F's 1410mm. The seat height is slightly higher for the CB500F at 790mm compared to the CBF 600 S's 785mm. In terms of weight, the CB500F is lighter with a curb weight of 192kg, while the CBF 600 S weighs 222kg with ABS.

In terms of fuel capacity, the CBF 600 S has a larger tank with a capacity of 20 liters, while the CB500F has a slightly smaller tank with a capacity of 15.7 liters.

Honda CB500F 2013

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The CBF 600 S has the advantage of ABS, an adjustable seat in three positions (height), and an adjustable handlebar in two positions. It offers an excellent riding experience and is suitable for beginners. On the other hand, the CB500F has a relatively low total weight, making it agile and easy to handle. It also has an acceptable chassis and provides good comfort with a strong engine and a comfortable seating position.

However, the CBF 600 S is criticized for its image as being ordinary and lacking emotions. On the other hand, the CB500F has some weaknesses in terms of partially deficient finishing and the lack of a gear indicator.

In conclusion, the Honda CBF 600 S 2010 and the Honda CB500F 2013 are both capable naked bikes from Honda, but they differ in terms of engine power, frame material, braking system, dimensions, and weights. Each bike has its own strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities when choosing between the two.