Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2020
Kawasaki ER-6f 2006
Kawasaki Z650 2020
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 vs Kawasaki Z650 2020
The Kawasaki ER-6f model year 2006 and the Kawasaki Z650 model year 2020 are both motorcycles from Kawasaki with similar technical specifications. They both have a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 649cc and a 4-stroke, liquid-cooled cooling system. They also have a chain transmission and similar dimensions in terms of wheelbase and seat height.
In terms of power, the Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 has a slightly higher horsepower of 72 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z650 2020, which has 68.2 HP. However, it is worth noting that the power of the ER-6f decreases rapidly at high speeds, which can be a disadvantage for riders looking for sustained power.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2006
Both motorcycles have their strengths. The Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 is known for its comfortable cruising speed of up to 180km/h, surprising power, bold appearance, decent build quality, easy handling, excellent braking system, and ABS. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 is praised for its powerful 2-cylinder engine, aggressive intake noise, compact dimensions, low seat height, stable chassis, TFT screen with connectivity, and mature appearance.
Kawasaki Z650 2020
However, they also have their weaknesses. The Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 experiences a decrease in power at high speeds, which can be a drawback for riders who want sustained power at all speeds. The Kawasaki Z650 2020 has been criticized for having a point of pressure on the front brake, which can affect braking performance. Additionally, it may not be comfortable for taller riders, and the Rideology application is not considered to be 100% sophisticated.
In conclusion, both the Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 have their strengths and weaknesses. The ER-6f offers a comfortable cruising speed and powerful performance, while the Z650 impresses with its powerful engine and mature appearance. However, the ER-6f may experience a decrease in power at high speeds, and the Z650 has some potential issues with the front brake and comfort for taller riders. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 em comparação com Kawasaki Z650 2020
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6f 2006
A ER-6f também estará disponível na Áustria como uma mota leve - embora os jovens tendam a optar pela mais fresca ER-6n. Ambos os modelos, no entanto, são motos que são divertidas de conduzir por mais do que apenas alguns meses. O motor é particularmente adequado para os principiantes. Não há necessidade de comprometer o conforto, a resposta do acelerador e o comportamento de mudança de carga.
Kawasaki Z650 2020
É simplesmente maravilhoso o que a Kawasaki juntou num pacote completo com a nova Z650. Os componentes técnicos podem não impressionar individualmente, mas em conjunto formam uma mota agradavelmente neutra que todos irão apreciar. Não há idiossincrasias desagradáveis - simplesmente uma mota naked que funciona muito bem em estradas rurais sinuosas. Claro que o ecrã TFT, que não encontramos na concorrência neste momento, é uma mais-valia, tal como o aspeto adulto, que está fortemente orientado para os modelos Z maiores. Apenas o ponto de pressão do travão dianteiro poderia ter sido mais claramente definido - mas não se pode ter tudo nesta gama de preços.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki Z650
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 and a Kawasaki Z650 2020. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z650 with 80 days compared to 85 days for the Kawasaki ER-6f. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6f and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6f was published on 25/01/2006 and now has more than 30 200 views. This compares to more than 25 000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 08/11/2016.
