KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z 750 2007
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Kawasaki Z 750 2007
Visão geral - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs Kawasaki Z 750 2007
The KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 are both naked bikes with liquid-cooled engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of the engine, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a single cylinder engine with a displacement of 690cc, while the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 has a four-cylinder engine with a displacement of 748cc. This means that the KTM has a smaller engine compared to the Kawasaki, which may result in slightly less power. However, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 is known for its lightweight construction, which makes it agile and easy to handle. It also has sufficient power for most riding situations and offers low fuel consumption.
KTM 690 Duke 2013
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 has an improved torque curve and an aggressive engine, which may provide a more thrilling riding experience. It also features an inverted fork, which enhances the bike's handling and stability. Additionally, the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 is known for its affordable price, making it a popular choice among budget-conscious riders.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, while the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18.5 liters. This means that the Kawasaki has a longer range before needing to refuel.
When it comes to strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 stands out for its lightweight construction, sufficient power, and low fuel consumption. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 offers an improved torque curve, an aggressive engine, an inverted fork, and an affordable price.
Kawasaki Z 750 2007
However, both models have their weaknesses as well. The KTM 690 Duke 2013 lacks the ability to adjust the frame and may not offer the same level of comfort as other bikes in its class. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 has a higher weight compared to the KTM, and it also has 4 fewer horsepower than its predecessor. Additionally, some riders may find the Kawasaki Z 750 2007's ride to be slightly less effortless compared to other bikes.
In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Kawasaki Z 750 2007 are both solid choices in the naked bike category. The KTM offers a lightweight construction, sufficient power, and low fuel consumption, while the Kawasaki provides an improved torque curve, an aggressive engine, an inverted fork, and an affordable price. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas KTM 690 Duke 2013 em comparação com Kawasaki Z 750 2007
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Para pura diversão, a 690 Duke sem o R já é suficiente. O potente motor monocilíndrico é quase idêntico, tal como o peso e o manuseamento, e o aspeto é demasiado semelhante para ser um verdadeiro ponto de venda para a 690 Duke R.
Kawasaki Z 750 2007
Uma boa bicicleta a um preço muito bom, especialmente a forquilha invertida é convincente.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado KTM 690 Duke vs Kawasaki Z 750
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a Kawasaki Z 750 2007. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. A KTM 690 Duke 2013 experiences a loss of 250 EUR in one year and 760 EUR in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 350 EUR and 740 EUR for a Kawasaki Z 750 2007. Compared to Kawasaki Z 750 2007 there are more KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 7. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z 750 with 55 days compared to 60 days for the KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 8 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 750 since model year 2005. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 28/09/2007 and now has more than 14 800 views. This compares to more than 10 300 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z 750 published on 25/10/2006.
