BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011
Visão geral - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011
The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 comes out on top with a motor power of 160 HP, compared to the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011's 100 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 112 Nm, while the Ducati has a torque of 103 Nm. This makes the BMW more powerful and capable of delivering exhilarating acceleration.

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Both bikes have a similar setup in terms of their chassis and braking system. They both feature a tubular frame and dual disc brakes with four pistons and radial technology at the front. This ensures excellent braking performance and stability during high-speed riding.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, there are some slight differences between the two models. The BMW has a slightly narrower front tire width of 120 mm, compared to the Ducati's 120 mm. The rear tire width is also wider on the BMW at 190 mm, while the Ducati has a width of 180 mm. The BMW has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439 mm, compared to the Ducati's 1450 mm. Both bikes have a similar seat height, with the BMW at 814 mm and the Ducati at 810 mm. The BMW also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters, compared to the Ducati's 13.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, excellent electronic aids, and a great price-performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on both the race track and rural roads. On the other hand, the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011 has a sophisticated design, a comfortable seat, good traction control, ABS, and offers a fun riding experience.

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011
However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 does have some weaknesses. The engine operation can be slightly rough, the Dynamic Damping Control (DDC) is effective but can still be a bit stiff, the seat is relatively high, and the design is subjective to personal taste. On the other hand, the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011 has partially unnecessary electronic parts.
In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers more power and a better overall performance, while the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011 has a sophisticated design and offers a fun riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on personal preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas BMW S 1000 R 2014 em comparação com Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Potência brutal, eletrónica suave, quase perfeita, só melhora com a HP4. Agora a BMW domina a classe das motos naked de 1000cc depois das superbikes.
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011

A Monster 1100 Evo continua a ser uma moto naked honesta na melhor tradição bolonhesa, apesar de uma quantidade dispensável de dispositivos electrónicos. Não é apenas a mais bela "New Monster", mas também a mais rápida. Com 100 cv e 105 Nm, os valores internos são tão equilibrados como os externos.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado BMW S 1000 R vs Ducati Monster 1100 Evo
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 8% higher. Compared to Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2011 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 1100 Evo with 68 days compared to 70 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 5 reviews for the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo since model year 2010. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17 300 views. This compares to more than 16 000 views for the first review on Ducati Monster 1100 Evo published on 19/05/2011.